Amphora cf. proteus W.Gregory
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.544.2.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6505203 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF17878C-EA37-FFCA-FF03-FCC7FB105757 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amphora cf. proteus W.Gregory |
status |
|
figs 2A–C & 8D:
Morphometric data:— L: 40.7–52.5 µm; W: 8.5–9.8 µm; DS: 11–13; VS: 10–12 (n=5).
Notes:— These valves do not fit entirely A. proteus since they usually have a single elongated areola on the ventral side, and not two rows of areolae as in A. proteus ( Schoeman & Archibald 1986, Levkov 2009), although a very short second row could be present (figs 2B–C), as in some of the valves of A. proteus in Levkov (2009, Pl. 248: 6). Valves are also slightly smaller than those of the original A. proteus (length> 50 µm, width> 9 µm, Schoeman & Archibald 1986, Levkov 2009). However, the only valve we were able to find under SEM (fig. 8D) showed the presence of dimple-like depressions internally near the elongated central nodule, as in A. proteus ( Levkov 2009, Pl. 248: 6). Another similar taxon in both dimensions and striation pattern, A. proteoides f. varians Proshkina-Lavrenko , was described from the Black Sea ( Proshkina-Lavrenko 1963). Unfortunately, it is only known from her description and drawings (Proshkina-Lavrenko 1963, Pl. IX: 1–4), presenting insufficient details for species separation nowadays.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |