Ecrobia sp., 1865

Neubauer, Thomas A. & Wesselingh, Frank P., 2023, The Early Pleistocene freshwater mollusks of the Denizli Basin (Turkey): a new long-lived lake fauna at the crossroads of Pontocaspian and Aegean-Anatolian realms, Zitteliana 97, pp. 53-88 : 53

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zitteliana.97.115682

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:933EC356-F21C-45AF-9CFA-563E64D27953

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE219B80-EC72-550F-9BE0-3190D68B3CA7

treatment provided by

Zitteliana by Pensoft

scientific name

Ecrobia sp.
status

 

Ecrobia sp. View in CoL

Fig. 8A-F, Q View Figure 8

Material.

1 specimen (RGM 962612), 4 specimens (RGM 1310850), 1 specimen SNSB-BSPG 2023 XII 6); all from sample 2.

Dimensions.

5.54 × 3.55 mm (RGM 962612; Fig. 8A-C, Q View Figure 8 ), 4.61 × 3.01 mm (SNSB-BSPG 2023 XII 6, Fig. 8D-F View Figure 8 ).

Remarks.

The shape of the shell and the aperture and the type of growth lines are typical of the genus Ecrobia . The protoconch includes ~1.1 whorls and appears to be smooth (the preservation of the apex is, however, rather poor). The P/T boundary is marked by the onset of growth lines. Shape-wise our specimens fall well into the morphological range of extant E. grimmi (Clessin in Dybowski, 1887) from the Caspian Sea, but it also resembles stout forms of the widespread European E. ventrosa (Montagu, 1803) and the Black Sea/eastern Mediterranean species E. maritima (Milaschewitsch, 1916). Only, our material is exceptionally large for Ecrobia and has a slightly thickened aperture, which is untypical as well. It might well represent an undescribed species, but since Ecrobia species are known to be extremely variable ( Kantor and Sysoev 2006; Neubauer et al. 2018; Vandendorpe et al. 2019) and we have only limited material available for comparison, we refrain from introducing a new species.