Formicococcus robustus (Ezzat & McConnell)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4718.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51AB6842-F063-4580-B30F-65102ABA797C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5919288 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC7EE859-2705-FFD7-F6BF-FC00FBC0F84A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Formicococcus robustus (Ezzat & McConnell) |
status |
|
Formicococcus robustus (Ezzat & McConnell) revived combination
Planococcoides robustus Ezzat & McConnell, 1956: 59 View in CoL .
Indococcus pipalae Ali, 1967: 35 View in CoL .
Dysmicoccus cucurbitae Avasthi & Shafee, 1986: 437 View in CoL .
Planococcoides bengalensis Ghosh & Ghose, 1988: 604 View in CoL .
Ferrisicoccus cucurbitae, Tang, 1992: 286 View in CoL . Change of combination.
Ferrisicoccus psidii Mukhopadhyay & Ghose, 1994: 71 View in CoL .
Formicococcus robustus Williams, 2004: 307 . Change of combination.
Paraputo robustus, Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin 2015: 18 . Change of combination.
The species was described and illustrated by Ezzat & McConnell (1956) based on a single adult female found on mango, Mangifera indica View in CoL L. ( Anacardiaceae View in CoL ) imported into the U.S.A. from India and intercepted in New York. The four junior synonyms of this species are all based on specimens collected in India; for a full synonymy with collection data and depositories for type specimens, refer to ScaleNet ( García Morales et al. 2016). When Williams (2004) revised the genus Formicococcus View in CoL , he examined many specimens of F. robustus from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh and provided a revised description, two illustrations of the adult females from different collections, and discussed the morphology. Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin (2015) transferred the species to Paraputo Laing View in CoL because it has 6 anal ring setae; they restricted the definition of Formicococcus View in CoL to species with more than 6 anal ring setae, although they transferred only two species of Formicococcus View in CoL , viz., F. robustus and F. lingnani (known from India) to Paraputo View in CoL . However, as discussed by Williams (2004) and Zhang & Wu (2017), the number of anal ring setae is not a robust genus-level character, especially as the number of setae can vary between the two sides of the anal ring. Furthermore, in both genera there are 6 basic anal ring setae and, if more are present, the extra setae are usually short and slender and variable in position. Adult females of Formicococcus View in CoL and Paraputo View in CoL are morphologically similar and these genera clearly are related, but have been distinguished by the presence ( Formicococcus View in CoL ) or absence ( Paraputo View in CoL ) of the anal lobe bar ( Williams 2004; Zhang & Wu 2017). Formicococcus robustus and the other seven species of this genus known from India each have anal lobe bars. The type species of Formicococcus View in CoL , F. cinnamomi Takahashi View in CoL , is from Taiwan ( Takahashi 1928; Ezzat & McConnell 1956; Tu et al. 1988), whereas the type species of Paraputo View in CoL , now called P. anomalus (Newstead) , is from Africa (and was redescribed by Williams 1958).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Formicococcus robustus (Ezzat & McConnell)
Joshi, Sunil, Jose, Bindu K., Gullan, Penny, Sajeev, T. V. & Anoop, E. V. 2020 |
Paraputo robustus, Danzig & Gavrilov-Zimin 2015: 18
Danzig, E. M. & Gavrilov-Zimin, I. A. 2015: 18 |
Formicococcus robustus
Williams, D. J. 2004: 307 |
Ferrisicoccus psidii
Mukhopadhyay, A. K. & Ghose, S. K. 1994: 71 |
Ferrisicoccus cucurbitae
Tang, F. T. 1992: 286 |
Planococcoides bengalensis
Ghosh, L. C. & Ghose, S. K. 1988: 604 |
Dysmicoccus cucurbitae
Avasthi, R. K. & Shafee, S. A. 1986: 437 |
Indococcus pipalae
Ali, S. M. 1967: 35 |
Planococcoides robustus
Ezzat, Y. M. & McConnell, H. S. 1956: 59 |