Paederus littoralis GRAVENHORST, 1802
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.21248/contrib.entomol.68.1.031-067 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1E9D416-0015-4C82-8CE1-291E5E84844D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5907744 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC314000-4561-FFB8-FCF0-FE93FBE88428 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Paederus littoralis GRAVENHORST, 1802 |
status |
|
Paederus littoralis GRAVENHORST, 1802 View in CoL
Paederus pelikani REITTER, 1884b: 44 View in CoL f.; syn. nov.
In the original description of P. pelikani View in CoL , which is based on an unspecified number of syntypes from Corfu, REITTER (1884b) compares the species with P. (Harpopaederus) baudii FAIRMAIRE, 1860 View in CoL and P. (H.) brevipennis LACORDAIRE, 1835. Based on a study of “le type et und série de paratypes ” [sic], COIFFAIT (1982) provides a short redescription and illustrations of the aedeagus. In contrast to REITTER (1884b), however, he states that P. pelikani View in CoL is closely allied to P. littoralis View in CoL , a species currently assigned to the subgenus Poederomorphus GAUTIER DES COTTES, 1862 ( SCHÜLKE & SMETANA 2015). According to COIFFAIT (1982), P. pelikani View in CoL is distinguished from P. littoralis View in CoL only by shorter elytra of more trapezoid shape and by the apically truncate dorsal plate of the aedeagus, and it replaces P. littoralis View in CoL in the Ionian Islands and is also found in Albania and the Pelopónnisos.
A study of material of P. littoralis and P. pelikani from Corfu, mainland Greece (from the north southwards to the Pelopónnisos), the Aegean Islands, Albania, and various other regions ( Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Serbia, Turkey (numerous localities across the whole country), Israel, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia revealed considerable variation in elytral length and shape, as well as in other external characters. The specimens from Corfu and Albania are indeed at the lower end of the range of elytral length, and their elytra are of more trapezoid shape than those of material seen from other regions. On the other hand, intermediate conditions were observed in populations from the Pelopónnisos and Turkey. Moreover, significant differences in the morphology of the aedeagus were not found. There is, however, some variation in the shapes of the dorsoapical structures (the pair of sclerotized hook-shaped structures best visible in lateral view). They are stout and more or less distinctly angled (lateral view) in material from Corfu, stout and smoothly curved in material from the Caucasus region ( Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, East and Northeast Anatolia (Erzurum, Van), and slender and smoothly curved in other regions. Intermediate forms were observed in material from the Pelopónnisos and from southwestern Anatolia (Antalya). These observations suggest that the variation is somewhat clinal, but unlikely to represent interspecific variation. There are numerous other examples of deviant elytral length in island populations (e.g., Othius lapidicola ( ASSING 1997b)) and of variation of aedeagal shape (e.g., species of Leptobium CASEY, 1905 ( ASSING 2005)). Therefore, based on currently available evidence, the populations from Corfu are regarded as conspecific with P. littoralis . Hence the synonymy proposed above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paederus littoralis GRAVENHORST, 1802
Assing, Volker, Schülke, Michael, Brachat, Volker & Meybohm, Heinrich 2018 |
Paederus pelikani
REITTER, E. 1884: 44 |