Lysiteles tangi Wang & Mi, 2024
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e120347 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9008DF06-BD6B-4299-BAA0-C399A5504D99 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/02DC55AE-B124-4515-8655-E18C85AA3906 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:02DC55AE-B124-4515-8655-E18C85AA3906 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Lysiteles tangi Wang & Mi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lysiteles tangi Wang & Mi sp. nov.
Materials
Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: individualID: TRU-TD-XZ-009; sex: male; occurrenceID: 34D4A470-E496-54CD-8C0A-D1DEED658CCC; Taxon: scientificName: Lysiteles tangi sp. nov.; Location : country: China; stateProvince: Xizang Autonomous Region ; county: Zayu ; locality: Cibagou National Nature Reserve ; verbatimElevation: 2880 m; verbatimLatitude: 28°46.62′N; verbatimLongitude: 97°0.86′E; Identification: identifiedBy: Cheng Wang; Event: samplingProtocol: beating shrubs; year: 2023; month: June; day: 24 Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: individualID: TRU-TD-XZ-010-025; sex: 6males, 10 females; occurrenceID: 56128EA8-3090-547A-B07E-6361FA058159; Taxon: scientificName: Lysiteles tangi sp. nov.; Location : country: China; stateProvince: Xizang Autonomous Region ; county: Zayu ; locality: Cibagou National Nature Reserve ; verbatimElevation: 2880 m; verbatimLatitude: 28°46.62′N; verbatimLongitude: 97°0.86′E; Identification: identifiedBy: Cheng Wang; Event: samplingProtocol: beating shrubs; year: 2023; month: June; day: 24 GoogleMaps GoogleMaps GoogleMaps GoogleMaps
Description
Male (holotype, TRU-TD-XZ-009). Total length 3.76. Carapace 1.88 long, 1.67 wide; Abdomen 1.91 long, 1.24 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.24, PME 0.08, PLE 0.18; AME-AME 0.16, AME-ALE 0.13, PME-PME 0.28, PME-PLE 0.32; MOA 0.32 long, front width 0.41, back width 0.46. Measurements of legs: I 7.49 (2.20, 0.83, 1.88, 1.63, 0.95), II 7.64 (2.33, 0.78, 1.93, 1.65, 0.95), III 4.98 (1.50, 0.63, 1.25, 1.00, 0.60), IV 5.08 (1.60, 0.55, 1.25, 1.08, 0.60). Carapace (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 E) pale yellow, with slightly elevated cephalon and sub-oval thorax. Chelicerae, endites and labium pale yellow. Endites (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 F) longer than wide, bearing dense inner-distal brown setae. Sternum (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 F) pale yellow, with re-curved anterior margin and gradually narrowed posteromedially. Legs pale to dark yellow, with sparse dark brown spots. Abdomen (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 E, F) elongated, dorsum pale yellow to dark, with antero-marginal sliver spots, pair of median muscle depressions and prominent dark marking; venter pale to dark, with centre, longitudinal, dark band. Palp (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 A, B): tibia longer than wide; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) short, slightly curved inwards medially and blunt apically; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) strongly sclerotised, sheet-shaped, widened at base, slightly curved towards retrolateral side distally; cymbium longer than wide; bulb flat, with sperm duct extending along the sub-margin; embolus (E) strongly sclerotised, originating from antero-apical portion of bulb, retrolaterally extending, slightly curved medially and with pointed end.
Female (paratype, TRU-TD-XZ-016). Total length 3.35. Carapace 1.57 long, 1.46 wide; Abdomen 1.81 long, 1.46 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.14, ALE 0.23, PME 0.08, PLE 0.17; AME-AME 0.17, AME-ALE 0.13, PME-PME 0.29, PME-PLE 0.32; MOA 0.32 long, front width 0.42, back width 0.46. Measurements of legs: I 5.46 (1.63, 0.68, 1.30, 1.10, 0.75), II 5.51 (1.65, 0.63, 1.35, 1.13, 0.75), III 3.80 (1.15, 0.50, 0.95, 0.70, 0.50), IV 3.98 (1.25, 0.50, 0.95, 0.78, 0.50). Habitus (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 G, H) similar to that of male, except with irregular dark brown markings on carapace. Epigyne (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 A-D): wider than long, with broad, labiate, anterior transversal sclerotised plate (TSP) almost equal to the epigynal width; copulatory openings beneath the median portion of the base of transversal sclerotised plate; copulatory ducts (CD) short, strongly curved medially; spermathecae (S) almost spherical, separated from each other about half their diameter; fertilisation ducts (FD) originating from the inner-base of spermathecae, lamellar.
Diagnosis
Lysiteles tangi sp. nov. closely resembles that of L. bhutanus Ono, 2001, no matter in habitus nor copulatory organs, but it can be distinguished by the following: 1) the retrolateral tibial apophysis is widened at base and longer than the ventral tibial apophysis in retrolateral view (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 B), versus almost equal in width and almost as long as the ventral tibial apophysis in L. bhutanus ( Ono 2001: figs 46, 47); 2) the copulatory openings are below the most anterior portions of spermathecae (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 C, D), versus beyond the most anterior portions of spermathecae in L. bhutanus ( Ono 2001: fig. 50). The female is also similar to that of L. linzhiensis Hu, 2001 in having similar habitus and epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the transversal sclerotised plate, which is labiate and almost equal in width to epigyne (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 A, B), versus sub-triangular and about half the epigynal width in L. linzhiensis ( Hu 2001: fig. 8-206-2).
Etymology
The specific name is a patronym of the late Chinese arachnologist, Dr. Guo Tang, who has significantly contributed to the taxonomy of Chinese Lysiteles ; noun (name) in genitive case.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Xizang, China (Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ).
Taxon discussion
The pairing has been supported by the unpublished molecular evidence.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |