Ophioplocus imbricatus (MÜLLER & TROSCHEL, 1842), Muller & Troschel, 1842
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D446E3D3-5B5B-431A-80E6-1318638DFA27 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6067328 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB2CDC0C-FFF1-FFD4-FF65-FCFF57B7FB27 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ophioplocus imbricatus (MÜLLER & TROSCHEL, 1842) |
status |
|
Ophioplocus imbricatus (MÜLLER & TROSCHEL, 1842) complex
(UF-6489, Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 f, KC759944 View Materials )
Material. 2 spms, St. 1; 1 spm, St. 3; 2 spms, St. 4; 3 spms, St. 5; 3 spms, St. 8
Remarks. The specimens are easily recognizable by the fragmented dorsal arm plates arranged in a symmetrical pattern. The radial shields are very small and elongate. They are grey/brown with darker lines. Little morphological variation was evident in specimens we studied across the distribution of this species. The only noticeable variation was in the dark lines on the disc that sometimes form a circle and give an impression of a soccer ball, and in the ventral side that can be more or less dark coloured. This species is common under rocks. COI sequence data indicates that SWIO populations are deeply divergent from populations in W Australia and the Pacific (Boissin et al. in revision). The species was described from Mauritius and Timor. Abundance: 3.
Distribution. Widespread in the IWP from East Africa to Hawaii ( Clark & Rowe 1971), previously reported from Réunion ( Guille & Ribes 1981; Stöhr et al. 2008) and Rodrigues ( Rowe & Richmond 2004).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |