Monteira distanti Synave, 1957
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13273066 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3139AEED-C27C-4EE7-BFFE-844F3193AE15 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB0C87C1-FF85-6B3F-FDCC-A1A94F56F7A4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Monteira distanti Synave, 1957 |
status |
|
Monteira distanti Synave, 1957 View in CoL
Figs 3 View Fig , 5 C–D View Fig , 6 View Fig
Monteira distanti SYNAVE, 1957: 68 View in CoL , figs 31, 32 [described, aedeagus illustrated].
Monteira cornicula View in CoL – DISTANT, 1907: 199, pl. XX figs 7, 7a [listed, habitus and head illustrated (misidentification of M. distanti View in CoL )]
MATERIAL EXAMINED.
TYPE MATERIAL. Paratypes: 6♂, 6♀: Swaziland, Eranchi , 15-31.XII.1954, A.L. Capener ( RBINS); 1♂, 1♀: Swaziland, Eranchi, 1-10.I.1955, A.L. Capener ( RBINS) .
Swaziland: 1♂, 1♀: Eranchi, A.L. Capener ( RBINS) . South Africa: 1♀: Shiluwane, XI.1899, Rev. Junod ( RBINS) ; 1♂: Barberton, XII.1952, E. Beverley ( RBINS) .
DIAGNOSIS. The species is easily separated from M. ameliae by its larger size (more than 6 mm). It can be separated from M. upembensis by the presence of dark markings inside the cells of the tegmina, and from M. cornicula by the regularly rounded costal margin of the tegmina and the broader vertex (5 times broader than long; 4 times in M. cornicula ).
However, the examination of the male genitalia should be used to recognize the species of the genus (see Fig. 5 View Fig C-D).
DISTRIBUTION. See map Fig. 6 View Fig .
RBINS |
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Monteira distanti Synave, 1957
Constant, Jérôme 2015 |
Monteira distanti SYNAVE, 1957: 68
SYNAVE H. 1957: 68 |
Monteira cornicula
DISTANT W. L. 1907: 199 |