Cosmosciara hartii ( Johannsen, 1912 ) Broadley & Kauschke & Mohrig, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4415.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:41DE1572-F169-4177-B375-D806682534F6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5986289 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA1B8F1B-E707-FFCB-FF51-FD72FEAF0C1E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cosmosciara hartii ( Johannsen, 1912 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Cosmosciara hartii ( Johannsen, 1912) View in CoL comb. n.
( Figs 7 A–B View FIGURE 7 , 8 A–C View FIGURE 8 , 9 A–D View FIGURE9 )
Sciara hartii Johannsen, 1912 View in CoL [ Johannsen (1912): 144].
Common synonyms: Plastosciara perniciosa Edwards, 1922 View in CoL ; Epidapus semifactus Mohrig & Röschmann, 1999 View in CoL . = Plastosciara perniciosa Edwards, 1922 View in CoL syn. n. [ Edwards (1922): 160–161].
Literature: Pettey (1918): 325, fig. 67 (as Neosciara hartii ); Steffan (1966): 36, 53 (as Bradysia hartii ); Mohrig et al. (2013): 223–224, fig. 43 a–c (as Pnyxia hartii ); Frey (1942): 24, 39 (as Cosmosciara perniciosa ); Frey (1948): 71, 88, pl. 22, fig. 130 (as Plastosciara (Cosmosciara) perniciosa ); Lengersdorf (1928–30): 13–14, pl. 1, fig. 10; Steffan (1973b): 1265– 1266, figs 1–2; Steffan (1974): 48 (all as Plastosciara perniciosa ); Tuomikoski (1960): 39; Freeman (1983): 25, 51, figs 49, 52, 60 (both as Plastosciara (Termitosciara) perniciosa ); Rulik et al. (1999): 31–32, fig. 7 a–e (as Epidapus semifactus ); Menzel & Mohrig (2000): 288–289 (as Cratyna (Peyerimhoffia) perniciosa ); Mohrig (2003): 64–65, fig. 46 a–d (as Epidapus (Clandestina) perniciosus ); Menzel & Heller (2007): 216–218 (as Cosmosciara perniciosa ).
Material studied. WESTERN AUSTRALIA: 1 male (morphotype I), 27.ii.2015, (Barcode of Life GMCWT350- 15 ; dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-SCIARWA; GenBank accession MG647953 View Materials ), Cockburn Wetlands Education Centre, - 32.0865S 115.831E, malaise trap, leg. D. Crosbie (BIOUG).
Other material: 2 males, 14.iii.2014, biosecurity intercept, (#5), in compost, wood mulch and leaf litter used to rear Lucanidae beetles ex China, hand collection, leg. C. Rajapakse ( PABM, PWMP) ; 2 males (maggot-like morphotype II), 4.viii.2006, biosecurity intercept ( Bottle #95085), taro ex Fiji, leg. C. Eather. Specimens were photographed and destroyed by PCR analysis.
Remarks. We now consider that Sciara hartii Johannsen is Cosmosciara perniciosa (Edwards) , based upon a repeated study of the partly destroyed hypopygium of the type species. The gonostylus has a fine hyaline spine below the apical tooth, the palpus is 1-segmented and the flagellomeres are short. Both species have also been bred from cucumbers ( Johannsen 1912; Edwards 1922). Therefore, Cosmosciara perniciosa ( Edwards 1922) is regarded as a junior synonym of Cosmosciara hartii ( Johannsen, 1912) .
The species is widespread and reported from numerous countries in both the northern and southern hemispheres. It is often associated with plant nurseries and is sometimes a pest. Like all greenhouse sciarids it has a population in open landscapes. In this case the larvae are phytosaprophagous and will also feed on rotting wood.
Cosmosciara hartii is a highly exceptional species because of an extreme morphological polymorphism in both sexes. Morphotype I includes fully winged males and females, which do not differ morphologically in body structures from other winged sciarids (figs 7, 8, 9 B). Morphotype II bears extraordinary modifications of all body structures (figs 9 A, C, D). The wings are micropterous, with strongly reduced legs and halteres as well as reduced eyes, ocelli and antennae, and the thorax has reduced sclerite borders. The genitalia do not show a strong reduction in both morphotypes (they are a little bit smaller and the apical tooth on the gonostylus is somewhat shorter than in winged males). The micropterous morphotype II develops under optimal conditions of larval feeding, whereas the winged morphotype I is common in larval habitats with limited resources where migration is necessary (Steffan 1973b).
Diagnostic remarks. Winged male specimens are characterised by a reduced palp with a large basal segment lacking a sensory pit, and a very small rudimentary second segment. The flagellomeres are short (l/w index 1.2) with long and strong bristles (longer than the diameter of the basal node) and rather long necks. The fore tibia is without a distinct patch of bristles and with one short spur. The mid and hind tibiae have two short spurs. The gonostylus is pointed towards the apex, with a short subapical tooth, possessing a few fine microtrichia at the tip and 1–2 fine stiff bristles. The tegmen is wider than long and trapezoid in shape. The micropterous specimens are maggot-like, with short rudimentary wings, halteres and legs, strongly reduced eyes and shortened antennae.
Economic importance. Sometimes found breeding en masse in plant nurseries, but not usually as common as other pest species. Reported as a pest of cucumbers grown under glass near Saint Petersburg (Leningrad), Russia ( Gerbatchevskaya 1963), in the UK ( Edwards 1922; Hussey et al. 1969) and USA ( Johannsen 1912; Mohrig et al. 2013). Common in open landscapes (herb gardens, moors, alder forest and deciduous woodland (Menzel & Smith 2009). Freeman (1983) noted that it has been collected from the nest of the ant Myrmica ruginodis Nylander. One male specimen (morphotype I) was collected in a malaise trap in Western Australia: this is the first Australian record. It has also been intercepted during the on-arrival biosecurity inspection of a consignment of taro imported from Fiji, and found in association with beetle rearing substrate intercepted from China.
Distribution. Probably cosmopolitan, known so far from the Holarctic (from China to Europe and the USA); Afrotropical region ( United Arab Emirates, Tristan da Cunha Islands, Seychelles); Neotropical region ( Costa Rica, Galápagos Islands), Australasia ( Australia); Polynesia ( French Polynesia, Hawaiian Islands); Oriental region ( Philippines).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cosmosciara hartii ( Johannsen, 1912 )
Broadley, Adam, Kauschke, Ellen & Mohrig, Werner 2018 |
Sciara hartii
Johannsen (1912) : 144 |