Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis X. C. Peng & T. C. Wen, 2024
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.102.113351 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D8102219-1BAD-5323-9C91-AE122DEAAB93 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis X. C. Peng & T. C. Wen |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis X. C. Peng & T. C. Wen sp. nov.
Fig. 2 View Figure 2
Etymology.
Named after the location where the type specimen was found, Fenggang County, Guizhou Province, China.
Diagnosis.
Parasitic on a larva of Lepidoptera . Stroma arising from the junction between head and thorax of lepidopteran larva, with a sterile tip. Perithecia immersed, grey-white.
Sexual morph.
Stroma solitary, unbranched, brown to grey-white, 102 × 1-1.5 mm. Fertile part up to 24 × 1.5 mm, cylindrical, attenuated toward the apex, grey-white when fresh, yellowish when dry, surface spinous due to the protruding ostioles, with a sterile tip (ca. 0.5 mm in length). Stipe cylindrical, brown to black, fibrous, 77.5 × 1-1.2 mm. Perithecia 306-496 × 134-223 μm (x̄= 388.4 × 175.9 µm, σ = 57.35 × 31.05, n = 15), immersed, ovoid to oblong-ovate. Asci 91-176 × 2-8 μm (x̄= 136.5 × 5.3 µm, σ = 38.22 × 2.63, n = 20), cylindrical, hyaline, with thickened apex. Apical cap 2.5-5.0 × 3.5-5.6 μm (x̄= 3.6 × 4.7 µm, σ = 0.78 × 0.48, n = 20), hyaline, hemispherical. Ascospores 0.3-0.7 µm (x̄= 0.4 µm, σ = 38.22 × 2.63, n = 20) wide, filiform, hyaline, easily breaking into part-spores. Secondary ascospores 2.8-6.0 × 0.3-0.7 μm (x̄= 4.0 × 0.4 µm, σ = 0.89 × 0.08, n = 20), cylindrical, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: undetermined.
Culture characteristics.
Colonies on PDA, attaining a diameter of 28-32 mm within 39 d at 20 °C, dense, leathery, cream white, convex, undulate margin, reverse brown, radial striation, no sporulation observed.
Material examined.
China, Guizhou Province, Fenggang County, Yongan Town (28°05′30.83″N, 107°31′53.38″E, alt. 1149 m), on dead larva of Lepidoptara, 28 April 2021, Xing-Can Peng, FG 21042850 (HKAS 125848 holotype, GACP FG21042850 ex-type living culture) GoogleMaps .
Notes.
Multigene phylogenetic analysis showed that Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis forms a sister clade to O. musicaudata with a high support value (98% ML / 0.93 PP) and grouped with O. alboperitheciata and Hirsutella kuankuoshuiensis (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis GACP FG21042850 and O. musicaudata GACP SY22072879 have 8 bp differences of nucleotides (0 bp in LSU, 3 bp in tef1-α and 5 bp in rpb1). Morphologically, Ophiocordyceps fenggangensis is distinguished from O. musicaudata in having a solitary unbranched shorter stroma, longer perithecia, smaller asci, narrower ascospores and disarticulating ascospores. Ophiocordyceps alboperitheciata is distinct from O. fenggangensis by its superficial, white to nearly light brown fertile part and ovoid perithecia ( Fan et al. 2021), whereas our new species has grey-white to yellowish fertile part and immersed, ovoid to oblong-ovate perithecia. Additionally, the stroma of O. fenggangensis is longer than that of O. alboperitheciata . Perithecia and asci of O. fenggangensis are smaller than those of O. alboperitheciata . Hirsutella kuankuoshuiensis was described only from its asexual morph which is characterised by clavate, narrow fusiform or botuliform conidia; and subulate or slender columnar phialides tapering gradually to a long narrow neck ( Qu et al. 2021). BLAST search result showed that the ex-type strain (GACP FG21042850) matches Hirsutella kuankuoshuiensis GZUIFR-2012KKS3-1; however, they are different in 59 bp (including 1 gap) and 8 bp (including 1 gap) within ITS and rpb1 sequences, respectively. The detailed comparisons of the morphologies between these four aforementioned species are shown in Table 2 View Table 2 . Based on the morphological differences, we introduce this fungus as a new species of Ophiocordyceps .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |