Parastrophia ornata, Vannozzi & Pizzini & Raines, 2015

Vannozzi, Angelo, Pizzini, Mauro & Raines, Bret, 2015, Revision of South African Caecidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda), African Invertebrates 56 (1), pp. 99-99 : 123

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.056.0109

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A9621F0-009E-4A25-A093-DD322B9EC120

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7662104

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D6171E5C-FFFF-FFAD-27D4-BD1485323300

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Parastrophia ornata
status

sp. nov.

Parastrophia ornata View in CoL sp. n.

Figs 18A–H View Fig , 20 View Fig , 25B, C View Fig

Etymology: Derived from the Latin adjective ornatus (= adorned), referring to the longitudinal microsculpture that adorns the teleoconch.

Description: Tube bisinuous, semitransparent, vitreous. Coiled protoconch formed by about 1.1 whorls; uncoiled protoconch conical, about 0.5 mm long, ending in a clear varix. The varix is asymmetrical, flange­like in the adapical side, shaped into a ring in the abapical side. Teleoconch smooth, with only some growth lines, especially close to the aperture, defining irregular rings. Microsculpture composed by fine longitudinal threads, slightly dextrally wound around the tube, rather sparse adapically, finer and denser abapically. The threads are interrupted by the growth lines, producing a wavy appearance. Operculum unknown.

Length: 2.5–2.7 mm.

Type locality: SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: Mzamba.

Holotype ( Fig. 25B View Fig ): SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: sh, Mzamba , near KwaZulu-Natal border, vii.1976 ( W9677 / T3379 ), length 2.71 mm, protoconch diam.0.14 mm, max. diam. (apertural end) 0.46 mm.

Paratypes: SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: 1 sh, same data as holotype ( JPM 2119 ); 1 sh (broken), Mzamba, beach, leg. J.P. Marais vii.1976 ( NMSA W9678 About NMSA / T3380 ) .

Additional material examined: SOUTH AFRICA: KwaZulu-Natal: 2 sh, off Richards bay , shallow dredgings, viii.1986 ( JPM) (lost) .

Distribution: Eastern coast of South Africa ( Fig. 20 View Fig ).

Remarks: This species can be compared with the Australian Parastrophia cygnicollis (Hedley, 1904) and P. erseusi Hughes, 1993 . It differs from the former by the different shape of the tube, which is longer and more slender in P. cygnicollis , by the shape of the adapical side of the varix, smoothly flaring in cygnicollis , flange­like in ornata , and by the presence of a microsculpture composed of fine longitudinal threads, whereas in cygnicollis a microsculpture composed of a few longitudinal wavy grooves is sometimes visible ( Pizzini et al. 2013: fig. 16O). Conversely, Parastrophia erseusi differs by the more or less symmetrical, evenly rounded varix and by the absence of microsculpture (Hughes 1993). Parastrophia ornata sp. n. is also similar to P. melanesiana Pizzini, Raines & Vannozzi, 2013 , which shares a similar microsculpture, but differs from it by the paucispiral coiled protoconch and by the different shape of the separation varix.

JPM

JPM

NMSA

South Africa, Kwa-Zulu Natal, Pietermaritzburg, Natal Museum

NMSA

KwaZulu-Natal Museum

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF