Parastrophia ornata, Vannozzi & Pizzini & Raines, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5733/afin.056.0109 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2A9621F0-009E-4A25-A093-DD322B9EC120 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7662104 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D6171E5C-FFFF-FFAD-27D4-BD1485323300 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Parastrophia ornata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Parastrophia ornata View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 18A–H View Fig , 20 View Fig , 25B, C View Fig
Etymology: Derived from the Latin adjective ornatus (= adorned), referring to the longitudinal microsculpture that adorns the teleoconch.
Description: Tube bisinuous, semitransparent, vitreous. Coiled protoconch formed by about 1.1 whorls; uncoiled protoconch conical, about 0.5 mm long, ending in a clear varix. The varix is asymmetrical, flangelike in the adapical side, shaped into a ring in the abapical side. Teleoconch smooth, with only some growth lines, especially close to the aperture, defining irregular rings. Microsculpture composed by fine longitudinal threads, slightly dextrally wound around the tube, rather sparse adapically, finer and denser abapically. The threads are interrupted by the growth lines, producing a wavy appearance. Operculum unknown.
Length: 2.5–2.7 mm.
Type locality: SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: Mzamba.
Holotype ( Fig. 25B View Fig ): SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: sh, Mzamba , near KwaZulu-Natal border, vii.1976 ( W9677 / T3379 ), length 2.71 mm, protoconch diam.0.14 mm, max. diam. (apertural end) 0.46 mm.
Paratypes: SOUTH AFRICA: Eastern Cape: 1 sh, same data as holotype ( JPM 2119 ); 1 sh (broken), Mzamba, beach, leg. J.P. Marais vii.1976 ( NMSA W9678 About NMSA / T3380 ) .
Additional material examined: SOUTH AFRICA: KwaZulu-Natal: 2 sh, off Richards bay , shallow dredgings, viii.1986 ( JPM) (lost) .
Distribution: Eastern coast of South Africa ( Fig. 20 View Fig ).
Remarks: This species can be compared with the Australian Parastrophia cygnicollis (Hedley, 1904) and P. erseusi Hughes, 1993 . It differs from the former by the different shape of the tube, which is longer and more slender in P. cygnicollis , by the shape of the adapical side of the varix, smoothly flaring in cygnicollis , flangelike in ornata , and by the presence of a microsculpture composed of fine longitudinal threads, whereas in cygnicollis a microsculpture composed of a few longitudinal wavy grooves is sometimes visible ( Pizzini et al. 2013: fig. 16O). Conversely, Parastrophia erseusi differs by the more or less symmetrical, evenly rounded varix and by the absence of microsculpture (Hughes 1993). Parastrophia ornata sp. n. is also similar to P. melanesiana Pizzini, Raines & Vannozzi, 2013 , which shares a similar microsculpture, but differs from it by the paucispiral coiled protoconch and by the different shape of the separation varix.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |