Neomuscina paramediana Lopes & Khouri, 1996
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.209438 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6615716D-7A12-41DC-963E-2E385D12A411 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6174132 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D55287D3-0A37-2A4E-FF4B-83439E21BE98 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neomuscina paramediana Lopes & Khouri, 1996 |
status |
|
Neomuscina paramediana Lopes & Khouri, 1996 View in CoL
( Figs. 77–82 View FIGURES 77 – 82 )
Neomuscina paramediana Lopes & Khouri 1996: 954 View in CoL fig. 6 (fifth sternite), 956 fig. 7 (aedeagus, dorsal view), 957 (description), 958 figs. 11 and 12 (cercal plate, dorsal view; cercal plate, lateral view); de Carvalho et al. 2005: 95 (catalogue).
Diagnosis: acrostichal 0:1, dorsocentral 2:4; male: intra-alar 1; mid femur with three preapical setae; wing hyaline; fore tibia with a distinct median anterodorsal setae; proepimeron and proepisternum with dark setulae; katepisternum with dark setulae on posteroventral surface.
Color: general body coloration brown; frons yellow, apex darkened; facialia, parafacialia, parafrontalia, antenna and palpus yellow; scutum with four dark stripes of grey pruinosity; femora apex yellow; calypters and halter yellowish white; wing hyaline.
Male. Length. Body: 6.0– 6.2 mm; wing: 6.5–6.8 mm.
Head: eyes separated from each other by 0.09–0.1 mm, at level of ocellar tubercle; 10–12 pairs of frontal setae; ocellar seta large and parallel; postocellar seta large and divergent; inner vertical and outer vertical setae small and divergent.
Thorax: acrostichal 0:1; dorsocentral 2:4; intra-alar 1; fore tibia with a distinct median anterodorsal setae; apex of fore tibia with setae on anterodorsal, dorsal, posterodorsal and posteroventral surfaces; mid femur with a row of setae on ventral surface from base to middle, and a row of weak anteroventral setae from base to basal quarter; mid femur with three preapical setae, on dorsal, posterodorsal and posterior surfaces; apex of mid tibia with setae on anterior, dorsal, posterodorsal, posteroventral, ventral and anteroventral surfaces; hind femur with a complete row of anterodorsal, dorsal and anteroventral setae; hind tibia with one median anterodorsal setae and two median anteroventral setae; hind tibia with anterior, anterodorsal, dorsal, ventral and anteroventral setae at apex; wing with one or two dorsal and one ventral setae at apex of stem vein.
Abdomen: fifth sternite with slight basal projection; epandrium with slight basal projection.
Female (differing as follows): Length. Body: 6.0– 6.3 mm; wing: 6.5–6.9 mm; eyes separated from each other by 0.28–0.3 mm, at level of ocellar tubercle; 9–10 pairs of frontal convergent setae, except for upper two pairs, parallel; ocellar and postocellar setae large and divergent; inner vertical seta large and convergent, and outer vertical seta large and divergent; intra-alars 2; sternite VIII with strong spike-like setae; epiproct with four setae, setae in a square-shaped arrangement (2:2).
Comments: As indicated by Lopes & Khouri (1996), N. paramediana is very similar to N. mediana , differing mainly by the hyaline wings. The males have a fifth sternite with a small basal projection and the epandrium with a small basal projection. The female has a characteristic sternite VIII, with strong spike-like setae.
Type material examined: Holotype: male; chaetotaxy in good conditions; abdomen dissected and stored in a microvial with glycerin; label: white, printed “ BRASIL, Goiás, Goianésia / XII-1972, Alvarenga leg.”; label: red, printed HOLOTYPE ( MNRJ). Type-locality: Goianésia, Goiás, Brazil.
Paratypes: BRAZIL. Bahia. 5 females “Encruzilhada, Divisa, 960m / Bahia, Brasil / Seabra & Roppa, XI-72 ” ( MNRJ) \ Goiás. 17 males and 19 females “Goianésia, Goiaz, Brasil / H. Ebert, 6-IX-69 ” ( MNRJ) \ 1 female “Goiânia, Goiaz, Brasil / H. Ebert, 6-IX-69 ” ( MNRJ) \ 1 female “Goianésia, Goiaz, Brasil / H. Ebert, 6-IX-69 ” ( MNRJ) \ Mato Grosso. 1 female “Salobra, 30-8-40 / Mato Grosso, Com. I.O.C.” ( MNRJ) \ Rio de Janeiro. 1 female “Angra dos Reis, E. do Rio, Brasil / H.S. Lopes, 12-XII-72 ” ( MNRJ) \ 1 male and 1 female “Angra dos Reis, E. do Rio, Brasil / H.S. Lopes, 14-XII-72 ” ( MNRJ) \ Rio Grande do Sul. 1 female “Rio Grande do Sul / S. Fco. de Paula, I-59 ” ( MNRJ) \ São Paulo. 1 female “Araçatuba – SP / Rio Jacareatinga / X-196, Lane & Rebello col.” ( MNRJ).
Other material examined: BRAZIL. Paraná. 1 male “Curitiba- PR / Mata Cebola / 07.II.1982 / C.B. Jesus col” \ 1 male “Curitiba- PR / Cidade Cebola / 07.II.1982 / C.B. Jesus col” ( DZUP).
Geographical distribution: Brazil (Bahia, Goiás [type-locality], Mato Grosso, Paraná [new rec.], Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neomuscina paramediana Lopes & Khouri, 1996
Pereira-Colavite, Alessandre & De, Claudio J. B. 2012 |
Neomuscina paramediana
Lopes 1996: 954 |