Elampus bidentatus Eversmann, 1857
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.486.8753 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:27F6744E-308F-415F-A6B9-2D67B2AA4A18 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D47BC7B6-57A5-A49D-6B12-4353D90699CD |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Elampus bidentatus Eversmann, 1857 |
status |
|
Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Chrysididae
Elampus bidentatus Eversmann, 1857
Elampus bidentatus Eversmann 1857: 548.
Type locality.
"Cepi in promont. Uralensib.".
Holotype
♀ [box 59]: Spa... Juni? [handwriting only partly readable] // Elampus bidentulus Kl. Dlbm. [handwritten by Eversmann] // brawn rounded label // red rounded label.
Remarks.
The examination of the type confirms that the name Elampus bidentatus is merely an incorrect spelling of Elampus bidentulus (Lepeletier, 1806). Eversmann listed this species as " Elampus bidentatus Klug, Dalbm". But the identification label attached to the type specimen reads " Elampus bidentulus Kl. Dlbm" in Eversmann’s handwriting. Dahlbom (1854) listed Elampus bidentulus Klug [and not bidentulus Lepeletier] in the dichotomous key (pagg.: 38, 39), in the index (pag. 406), and in the list of examined specimens (pag. 40). Eversmann was confused by this mistake. Dahlbom did not examine Lepeletier’s type and based his keys and description on a single specimen labelled by Klug as Elampus bidentulus in MNHU. The specimen matches the current interpretation of Philoctetes bidentulus (Lepeletier) ( Rosa 2006a; Rosa and Xu 2015) and the name can simply be considered an incorrect subsequent spelling.
Current status.
Philoctetes bidentulus (Lepeletier, 1806) (synonymised by Mocsary 1889: 85; transferred by Niehuis 2000).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |