Conophorisca Hedqvist
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1647.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9CDBECB7-17F1-4B0B-B577-CE29B34AA89A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D40DA74B-DE75-5459-AE8F-63A5FDE4B930 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Conophorisca Hedqvist |
status |
|
Conophorisca Hedqvist View in CoL
( Figs. 5–15 View FIGURES 5–10 View FIGURES 11–16 , 63, 64 View FIGURES 59–64 )
Conophorisca Hedqvist 1969: 199–201 View in CoL . Type species: Conophorisca annulata View in CoL (orig. desig. and by monotypy).
Diagnosis: Conophorisca belongs to a clade with Myrmicolelaps , and this clade can be diagnosed with 2 characters. First, the propodeal foramen is hinge-like, opening both dorsally and ventrally ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 29–34 ). All remaining diparines have a propodeal foramen which is circular and open only in 1 plane. Second, the petiole is at least 2X as long as broad and constricted antero-ventrally ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11–16 ). Few diparines have petioles more than 1.5X as long as broad, and all other diparines have a cylindrical petiole ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 59–64 ), or in the case of Conodipara , an L-shaped petiole. Within this clade, Conophorisca can be identified by having its toruli located on a shelf, where the upper face is separated from the lower face by a sharp angle of ~90° ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5–10 ), and also by lacking an expanded axillary wing sclerite ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 5–10 , see Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29–34 , aws, for presence of the sclerite).
Discussion: Conophorisca is resolved as monophyletic in only 1 of the phylogenetic analyses (the three species generally form an unresolved polytomy with Myrmicolelaps ). This combined clade is supported by a the presence of a hinge-like propodeal foramen and an antero-ventrally constricted petiole. However, Conopho- risca itself may actually represent a monophyletic lineage. The three characters which would support Conophorisca paraphyly are eye setation, presence/absence of a malar groove, and degree of claval fusion. The difficulty of coding eye setation is discussed in that character’s entry (#12). Regarding the malar groove and claval fusion, it is possible that reduction of the groove and fusion of all claval segments may be associated with a reduction of body size. Conophorisca grisselli is extremely small, and has both of these features, while the larger C. annulata and C. littoriticus have a malar groove and only 2 fused claval segments. On the other hand, the presence of a sharply angled torular shelf supports monophyly of the genus. While the previously mentioned characters are highly homoplastic in the analysis (e.g. setose eyes are independently derived 6 times), the torular shelf in only derived independently in one other taxon, Dozodipara . Therefore, Conophorisca is maintained as a valid genus herein.
Number of Species: 3 described, at least 3 undescribed.
Distribution: South Africa (Western Cape, Eastern Cape).
Hosts: Unknown.
Key to Species: Given below.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Conophorisca Hedqvist
Desjardins, Christopher A. 2007 |
Conophorisca
Hedqvist, K. - J. 1969: 201 |