Palingenia fuliginosa (Georgi, 1802)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2018.16.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8028195 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D36887BA-FF8A-B056-FF53-FC7EFA6BBDF7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Palingenia fuliginosa (Georgi, 1802) |
status |
|
Palingenia fuliginosa (Georgi, 1802) View in CoL
There are three species of the genus Palingenia Albarda, 1888 in the check list of Ukrainian mayflies (Godunko & Kłonowska- Olejnik 2003). Palingenia longicauda (Oliver, 1791) has not been registered in Ukraine since the thirties of the XX century ( Soldan et al. 2009). Registration of P. sublongilobata Tshernova, 1949 in Ukraine needed the confirmation, and Palingenia fuliginosa was only suggested for Ukraine (Godunko & Kłonowska- Olejnik 2003; Prokopov & Godunko 2007).
Generally confirmed distribution of P. fuliginosa falls within Iran, Caucasus and Slovak Republic ( Tshernova 1949; Demoulin 1965; Soldán 1978). Demoulin (1965) recorded P. fuliginosa for Crimea basing on one female imago from Kertch Peninsula. It was supposed that species do not develop in Crimea, and the caught specimen was carried by wind from Krasnodar Krai ( Russian Federation) ( Prokopov & Godunko 2007). The records of this species from the Salgir and Angara Rivers at Crimea by Kiseleva & Yezernitskiy (1985) was subjected to great doubt and consequently the species was removed from check list of mayflies of Crimea ( Prokopov & Godunko 2007). Thereby, up to now there are no facts confirming the development of this species within Ukraine.
We found P. fuliginosa in potamal zone of the Horyn’ and Styr Rivers within Rivne Region ( Figs 3, 4 View Figures 1–4 , 14, 15 View Figures 14–18 ). Larvae of different ages and winged stages were collected ( Figs 1, 2 View Figures 1–4 , 5 View Figures 5–8 ); this confirms the fact of development of the species within Ukraine. Moreover, these records extend the known distribution of the species towards North.
Habitat: In both rivers larvae of P. fuliginosa live under the similar conditions. All larvae were collected from their burrows in different substrates. Most typical substrates were the clay ( Fig. 5 View Figures 5–8 ) and dense deposits of sand, and we also collected some larvae from burrows made in poor bog iron ore with sandstone impurities ( Fig. 6 View Figures 5–8 ). Additionally we recorded that the larvae of last instars can rote the burrows through the wood when it is deposed in the main substrate ( Fig. 7 View Figures 5–8 ).
Current velocity in collecting sites ranged from 0.1 to 0.3 m /s. The inhabited holes of P. fuliginosa were registered at depth from 0.2 to 1.7 m (max depth of the rivers in the sampling places was about 3 m). The additional parameters of waterbodies in collecting places measured during the sampling were: water temperature 23–29°C, water hardness 259–270 ppm, pH 8.6–8.7.
Material: Ukraine, Rivne Region: 11 larvae, vicinity of Zbuzh village, Horyn’ River , 50.990300, 26.320683, h – 154 m a.s.l., Martynov A. V. leg., 7.07.2017 – IN Riv 2 Palful /1–2 GoogleMaps ; 20 larvae, 14 subimagoes, ibid, Dauletkulov S. leg., 10– 25.06.2017 – IN Riv 6 Palful /1–6 GoogleMaps ; 10 larvae, vicinity of Stara Rafalivka village, Styr River , 51.378866, 25.863339, h – 156 m a.s.l., Martynov A. V. leg., 2.08.2017 – IN Riv 7 Palful GoogleMaps .
Threats and recommendations for conservation: Palingenia fuliginosa is a highly stenobiotic species that prefers only the oxygenated unpolluted waterbodies. As the result, species inhabits only a few rare types of microhabitats in some middle-sized rives within Ukraine. We suppose that at the present time there are several main factors influencing the abundance of the species in discovered habitats except of the moderate pollution. The first factor is the significant decrease of the average water level in Horyn’ and Styr Rivers in last few years. Because of this decrease the main part of the suitable microhabitats appeared to be located above the water during most of a year. Many old burrows made by larvae of P. fuliginosa were registered above the water level. Now only a small area with suitable microhabitats was preserved in these rivers. Larvae of the species can not inhabit bottom and neighboring microhabitats because of their siltation.
The second factor is the human factor. It is very popular among the people of Rivne Region to collect the larvae and winged stages (imagoes and subimagoes) of P. fuliginosa for fishing. We consider this as a significant threat. People use special hand device that scrapes the substrate to collect the larvae ( Fig. 8 View Figures 5–8 ). Because of this the large areas of rare suitable habitats of the species were destroyed. Also people collect the newly emerged winged stages (mainly subimagoes) with the light traps. Before the water level decrease in the Horyn’ and Styr Rivers some people collected for the sale up to one hundred (!) kilograms of larvae and up to 5–6 hundreds (!) kilograms of winged stages (mainly subimagoes). Obviously the caught subimagoes could not participate in the reproduction. Because of significant restriction of the species’ distribution in the region, small area and number of suitable microhabitats and big volume of collected mayflies, we consider the human activity as one of the significant threats for the discovered (!) populations of P. fuliginosa .
Thus, we suppose that this species deserves to be included in the Red Data Book of Ukraine. Detailed investigation (also genetic affinity to other populations) of discovered populations of P. fuliginosa continues.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |