Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.35929/RSZ.0049 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5639982 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0118A7C-5B1C-0006-FC92-F8F3FE1F7DFC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991 |
status |
|
Genus Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991 View in CoL View at ENA
Stomotoca (Stomotocanna) Haeckel, 1879: 52 ;
type species Stomotoca pterophylla Haeckel, 1879 View in CoL by monotypy.
Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991: 198 View in CoL ; type species Stomotoca pterophylla Haeckel, 1879 View in CoL by original designation.
Diagnosis: Medusa with thick apical mesoglea and usually pointed apex; manubrium large, attached to a broad gastric peduncle, extending well beyond bell margin, mouth with crenulated lips; gonads in 8 adradial rows on manubrium, complexly transversely folded; two opposite perradial tentacles, numerous rudimentary bulbs on bell margin; no ocelli.
Hydroid parasitic on fish, with plate-like naked hydrorhiza, hydranth with no tentacles; gonozooid branched, producing at ends medusa buds.
Remarks: Larson (1982) reared medusae released from a parasitic hydroid of the genus Hydrichthys Fewkes, 1887 and could identify them as Stomotoca pterophylla Haeckel, 1879 . Because Larson’s hydroid showed little host specificity and many Hydrichthys polyps are rather similar, Larson concluded that they will also produce medusae referable to the genus Stomotoca L. Agassiz, 1862 . Therefore, he suggested to synonymize Hydrichthys and Stomotoca . This was contested by Boero & Bouillon (1989) who could show that the type species of Stomotoca – S. atra L. Agassiz, 1862 – had a polyp stage that was completely different from Hydrichthys (free living, with scattered tentacles). Moreover, the polyp of a tentatively identified Hydrichthys mirus Fewkes, 1887 – type species of the genus Hydrichthys – produced a Leuckartiara - like medusa ( Boero et al., 1991). Because Stomotoca pterophylla and Stomotoca atra have different polyps, Boero et al. (1991) proposed the new genus Larsonia for S. pterophylla . Boero et al. must have overlooked that Haeckel (1879) had already introduced a subgenus name for S. pterophylla , namely Stomotocanna Haeckel, 1879. As a subgenus level name automatically also becomes available at the genus level, Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991 is a junior synonym of Stomotocanna. However, because Haeckel’s name has not been used since its introduction and in the interest of nomenclatural stability, it should not be reactivated (ICZN, paragraph 23.9.1.1.)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Filifera |
Family |
Larsonia Boero, Bouillon & Gravili, 1991
Schuchert, Peter & Collins, Richard 2021 |
Larsonia
Boero F. & Bouillon J. & Gravili C. 1991: 198 |
Stomotoca (Stomotocanna)
Haeckel E. 1879: 52 |