Coptoborus bellus (Bright & Torres, 2006) Smith & Cognato, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.62246 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66F01A49-D324-48A8-AC26-69BF3374894C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CE97B237-812B-50EB-8C98-1138B8103470 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Coptoborus bellus (Bright & Torres, 2006) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Coptoborus bellus (Bright & Torres, 2006) comb. nov. Figure 2D-F, N View Figure 2
Coptoborus bellus Bright & Torres, 2006: 415.
Theoborus bellus Bright & Torres, 2006: Bright 2019: 273.
Type material.
Holotype (NMNH), examined.
New records.
None.
Diagnosis.
2.1-2.3 mm, 2.6 × as long as wide ( Bright and Torres 2006). This species is distinguished by the elytral apex feebly acuminate, declivital interstriae unarmed along its entire length, and antennal club with three sutures on posterior face.
Similar species.
C. attenuatus , C. katniss , C. sagitticauda , C. sarahconnor , C. sicula , C. yar .
Distribution.
Grenada, Puerto Rico.
Biology.
Unknown.
Remarks.
Wood’s (2007) measurements of three paratypes differ compared to the measurements of Bright and Torres’ original description (2006) and those of Bright (2019). Given the previously noted observations of calibration error in Wood’s measurements, these values are not included here. Bright (2019) reports that this species has only one suture on the posterior face of the club but it has two.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Coptoborus bellus (Bright & Torres, 2006)
Smith, Sarah M. & Cognato, Anthony I. 2021 |
Coptoborus bellus
Smith & Cognato 2021 |
Theoborus bellus
Smith & Cognato 2021 |