Parhoplognathus Ohaus, 1915

Moore, Matthew R., Jameson, Mary L., Garner, Beulah H., Audibert, Cedric, Smith, Andrew B. T. & Seidel, Matthias, 2017, Synopsis of the pelidnotine scarabs (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Rutelinae, Rutelini) and annotated catalog of the species and subspecies, ZooKeys 666, pp. 1-349 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.666.9191

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3C377E8-BBB1-4F32-8AEC-A2C22D1E625A

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD221ACF-7B69-8483-BE7D-F535F5A314D1

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Parhoplognathus Ohaus, 1915
status

 

Parhoplognathus Ohaus, 1915 View in CoL Fig. 52 View Figure 52

Type species.

Areoda maculata Gory, 1833.

Species.

4 species; length 12-16 mm.

On first glance, the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal forest endemic genus Parhoplognathus appears similar to areodine leaf chafers such as Areoda MacLeay or Byrsopolis Burmeister due to their strongly convex form (in lateral view) and the apex of the metatibia that possesses many spinules. However, whereas areodine chafers possess a complete frontoclypeal suture, species in the genus Parhoplognathus have an obsolete frontoclypeal suture.

Ohaus (1934b) considered Chipita mexicana , to be a member of the genus Parhoplognathus , but several morphological characters (in addition to the disjunct distribution) provide rationale for the monotypic genus Chipita . The genera Parhoplognathus , Chipita , and Platyrutela (an anticheirine leaf chafer) share several similarities, and phylogenetic analyses could examine this overlap.

Species in the genus Parhoplognathus are diagnosed by the following characters: pronotum with apical bead obsolete or lacking medially; clypeal apex quadrate, reflexed, with or without emargination; external edge of protibia with 3 teeth; all claws simple (shared with Chipita and Platyrutela ); mandibular palp with horizontal/longitudinal sulcus.

A synopsis of the species in the genus was provided by Soula (2008), but identification key, natural history, and general distributional information were omitted. Natural history, larvae, and sister-group relationships have not been examined for any species in the genus.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Scarabaeidae