Hypoponera bulawayensis (Forel) Bolton, B. & Fisher, B. L., 2011
publication ID |
23490 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6191038 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB070162-120D-E5AD-531E-3E1E81410467 |
treatment provided by |
Donat |
scientific name |
Hypoponera bulawayensis (Forel) |
status |
stat. n. |
Hypoponera bulawayensis (Forel) HNS stat. n.
(Figs 13 – 15)
Ponera ragusai st. bulawayensis Forel HNS , 1913a: 203. Holotype worker, ZIMBABWE: Bulawayo, 23.iii.13, no. 158 (G. A r n o ld) (MHNG) [examined]. Stat. n. [Combination in Hypoponera HNS : Bolton, 1995: 213.]
WORKER. Measurements: HL 0.54 – 0.55, HW 0.40 – 0.41, HS 0.475 – 0.480, SL 0.36 – 0.37, PrW 0.29 – 0.32, WL 0.72 (WL of holotype not measurable because head plus propleuron, prosternum and forelegs are detached as a unit and glued down so that they are partially on top of the pronotum), HFL 0.33 – 0.34, PeNL 0.20, PeH 0.30, PeNW 0.22, PeS 0.240 (2 measured). Indices: CI 73 – 76, SI 90, PeNI 70 – 76, LPeI 67, DPeI 110.
Eyes absent. Scape relatively long (SI 90) but when laid straight back from its insertion in full-face view its apex distinctly fails to reach the midpoint of the posterior margin; SL/HL 0.65 – 0.69. Funiculus distinctly with 5 enlarging apical segments. Reticulate-punctate sculpture of cephalic dorsum fine and dense. Pronotal dorsum with minute superficial punctulae, almost smooth, obviously less strongly and densely sculptured than cephalic dorsum. Mesonotum and dorsum of propodeum almost smooth, shiny and almost entirely devoid of punctulae. No trace of metanotal groove on dorsum of mesosoma. Mesonotal-mesopleural suture absent from side of mesosoma. Propodeum rounded between declivity and side. Posterior surface of petiole node without short cuticular ridges that radiate from just above the peduncle. Node of petiole in profile distinctly stout-nodiform, relatively long and low. Anterior and posterior faces of node in profile slightly convergent to almost parallel; length of node just above the anterior tubercle is slightly greater than length of dorsum; dorsal surface is very weakly convex. Subpetiolar process simple, with a shallow, obtuse ventral angle but without a sharply defined ventral tooth or prominent acute angle. In dorsal view petiole node relatively long, only 10 percent broader than long (DPeI 110), with posterior face transverse; sides and anterior face form a single thickly D-shaped convex surface, with the sides slightly convergent anteriorly. Maximum width of first gastral tergite in dorsal view 0.36; width of second gastral tergite at its midlength 0.38 – 0.40. Cross-ribs present at base of cinctus of second gastral tergite. Sides of second gastral tergite in dorsal view almost straight. Midline length of second gastral posttergite, from posterior margin of cinctus to apex, is equal to the maximum width of the segment. Disc of second gastral tergite finely microreticulate. First and second gastral tergites dorsally pubescent and with a number of very short standing setae that project just above the level of the pubescence. Full adult colour yellow.
The relatively long, low petiole node is characteristic of bulawayensis HNS . In section 1 of the abeillei HNS group the bulawayensis HNS LPeI 67 is approached only by angustata HNS , for which a maximum LPeI of 70 has been recorded. In all others the node in profile is much taller and shorter from front to back, with a combined range of LPeI 37 – 59. H. angustata HNS is not likely to be confused with bulawayensis HNS , as the former has shorter scapes, SI 71 – 79, and conspicuously has only four enlarged apical funicular segments, as opposed to SI 90 and five enlarging funicular segments in bulawayensis HNS .
In dorsal view the petiole node of bulawayensis HNS has DPeI 110, very long in proportion to its width. This is approached only by regis HNS (DPeI 100), angustata HNS (DPeI 100 – 125) and perparva HNS (DPeI 108 – 120). Of these, regis HNS is easily separated by the characters in the key while the last two are smaller species (HW 0.35 or less) and as noted above the first has only four conspicuously enlarged apical funicular segments. Also, both these small species have scapes that are relatively markedly shorter, SI 71 – 80, as opposed to SI 90 in bulawayensis HNS . Discounting these three species, the remainder of section 1 of the abeillei HNS group shows a combined DPeI of 133 – 187, far exceeding bulawayensis. As frequently happened in the early taxonomy of Afrotropical Hypoponera HNS , the name bulawayensis HNS was originally associated with a species to which it is not actually related, in this case ragusai HNS .
Only two specimens, from widely separated localities, are known. Both have exactly the same petiole measurements, SI, LPeI and DPeI. With the petiole node in profile the Tanzania specimen has its anterior and posterior faces slightly more convergent dorsally than in the holotype and its PrW is slightly greater, resulting in a slightly lower PeNI.
Material examined. Zimbabwe: Bulawayo (G. Arnold). Ta n z a n i a: Pwani Reg., Mlola For., Mafia I. (Hawkes, Mlacha & Ninga).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |