Phanerotoma longivena, Achterberg, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1014.60426 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C88695AF-39E3-5977-A232-AA75B54019D7 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phanerotoma longivena |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phanerotoma longivena sp. nov. Figs 209 View Figure 209 , 210-220 View Figures 210–220
Type material.
Holotype, ♀ (RMNH), " Yemen (no. 3285), Ta’izz, light trap, 22-24.viii.1998, A. van Harten & Ahmad Ahwad, RMNH’99”. Paratype: 1♀, "Yemen (7501), Al Kadan, light trap, i.2003, A. v. Harten & T. Abdul-Haq, RMNH’03”.
Diagnosis.
Among the species with the third metasomal tergite of ♀ 1.8-2.0 × as long as second tergite and tergite straight laterally easily to separate because of the long vein r (ca. 1.2 × as long vein 3-SR (Figs 209 View Figure 209 , 210 View Figures 210–220 ); in other species 0.2-0.7 ×), the apical half of the pterostigma largely dark brown (entirely yellow or partly slightly darkened in other species), the inner tooth of mandible 0.8 × as long as apical tooth (Fig. 215 View Figures 210–220 ; 0.1-0.3 ×), the eye in dorsal view ca. 3.4 × as long as temple (Fig. 217 View Figures 210–220 ; 1 View Figure 1 .7-2.5 ×) and in lateral view ca. 2.3 × as long as temple (Fig. 219 View Figures 210–220 ; 1 View Figure 1 .6-1.9 ×).
Description.
Female, holotype, length of body (excluding ovipositor) 4.7 mm; antenna 3.5 mm (but apical segment missing); fore wing 3.4 mm; visible part of ovipositor sheath 0.25 mm (setose part 0.15 mm).
Head. Width 1.5 × median length in anterior view and part of head above eye in lateral view 0.15 × height of eye (Fig. 219 View Figures 210–220 ); antenna with 22 segments (but apical segment missing) and slightly longer than fore wing, segments gradually shortened, narrowed apically and apical segments moniliform (Fig. 220 View Figures 210–220 ), third, fourth and penultimate segments 3.6, 3.0 and 1.4 × longer than wide in lateral view, respectively; area of stemmaticum coriaceous; OOL: diameter of posterior ocellus: POL = 10: 4: 5; length of eye 3.4 × temple in dorsal view (Fig. 217 View Figures 210–220 ); frons rugulose-coriaceous medially, rugose laterally and without median carina; vertex and temple finely and densely rugose, and rather dull; face densely and finely rugose and without distinct median ridge or median carina; clypeus mostly smooth, rather shiny and three minute teeth medio-ventrally (Fig. 218 View Figures 210–220 ); eye large in lateral view and 2.3 × (measured medially) temple (Fig. 219 View Figures 210–220 ), in anterior view slightly longer than minimum width of face (Fig. 218 View Figures 210–220 ); upper condyle of mandible above lower level of eyes (Fig. 218 View Figures 210–220 ); malar space coriaceous and 0.4 × as basal width of mandible; lower tooth of mandible 0.8 × as long as apical tooth (Fig. 215 View Figures 210–220 ).
Mesosoma (Figs 209 View Figure 209 , 211 View Figures 210–220 ). Length 1.5 × its width in lateral view; side of pronotum medially transversely rugose, dorsally superficially rugulose; mesoscutum finely rugulose with granulate background, densely setose; notauli slightly indicated; scutellar sulcus rather narrow and with eight short crenulae (Fig. 211 View Figures 210–220 ); scutellum triangular, finely granulate, matt; metanotum without median carina anteriorly and obtusely protruding posteriorly; propodeum coarsely reticulate, without median and transverse carinae, latero-posteriorly slightly tuberculate. Wings. Fore wing 2.7 × longer than its maximum width; length of 1-R1 1.5 × as long as pterostigma; r issued far beyond middle of pterostigma and 1.2 × 3-SR; 2-SR straight and distally converging with posterior margin of pterostigma (Fig. 210 View Figures 210–220 ); SR1 straight; 2-SR+M absent because of interstitial m-cu; parastigma large; 1-CU1 0.4 × as long as vein 2-CU1; r:3-SR:SR1 = 12:10:59; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 26:10:8; r-m vertical; 2-M slightly curved (Fig. 210 View Figures 210–220 ). Hind wing: M+CU:1-M:1r-m = 27:24:10. Legs. Hind femur 4.8 × as long as wide and widened subbasally; middle tibia with ivory blister; inner spur of middle tibia 0.4 × its basitarsus; hind coxa mostly smooth and shiny; hind tibia moderately widened medially (Fig. 214 View Figures 210–220 ).
Metasoma (Figs 212 View Figures 210–220 , 213 View Figures 210–220 ). Elongate elliptical in dorsal view, 2.2 × as long as wide and 1.7 × as long as mesosoma; first and second tergites coarsely longitudinally rugose and rugae with interconnections; third tergite 1.8 × longer than second tergite, in lateral view rather flat, densely reticulate-rugulose and medio-posteriorly truncate (Fig. 212 View Figures 210–220 ), lateral lamella not protruding latero-apically, medium-sized and medio-apically indistinct; setose part of ovipositor sheath moderately wide (Fig. 213 View Figures 210–220 ), 0.04 × as long as fore wing and visible part of ovipositor sheath 0.07 × as long as fore wing and 0.13 × metasomal carapace; hypopygium apically with acute triangle (Fig. 213 View Figures 210–220 ), without apical spine and with rather short setae.
Colour. Brownish yellow; palpi, mandible (except dark brown teeth), tegula (paler than brownish humeral plate), legs (but hind tibia distinctly darkened apically and hind femur largely brownish) and metasoma ventrally pale yellow or ivory; apical half of flagellum brown; stemmaticum and scutellum medio-posteriorly dark brown; pterostigma dark brown with large pale yellowish basal spot and white near apex (Fig. 210 View Figures 210–220 ); wing membrane slightly infuscate; parastigma (but yellowish anteriorly) and vein 1-M dark brown.
Male.
Unknown.
Variations.
Paratype: Very similar to holotype, length of fore wing of ♀ 3.1 mm; antenna of ♀ with 23 segments; metanotum with median carina anteriorly; propodeum weak irregular transverse carina; third tergite 1.8 × longer than second tergite and medio-apically with medium-sized lamella.
Biology.
Unknown.
Distribution.
Yemen.
Etymology.
Named after the comparatively long vein r of the fore wing.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |