Euodynerus (Euodynerus) bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5537.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8A7AF43F-0E83-48A0-950E-0716CDC753A6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14240065 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C866706D-6204-9A32-89FD-F5B2D543FC71 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euodynerus (Euodynerus) bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956 |
status |
|
Euodynerus (Euodynerus) bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956 View in CoL
( Figs 4B, E View FIGURE 4 )
Euodynerus bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956: 313 View in CoL , ♀ — “Bu el Gheràb (Tripolitanien)” (MZUB [examined]).
Distribution. Libya, currently known only from the typical locality of Bi’r Bu al Ghurab ( Blüthgen 1956). As reported above, Giordani Soika (1953) recorded E. bidentatus from Libya (Gharyan and Cyrenaica), but the real identity of those records remains to be assessed.
Notes. Blüthgen (1956) described this taxon as a Libyan subspecies of the western Maghrebi Euodynerus bidentatus (Lepeletier) , differentiating it by the reduced and ferruginous markings only ( Figs 4B, E View FIGURE 4 ). Other than the pattern, the comparison of two female specimens of E. bidentatus puniceus , including the holotype, with several specimens of the nominotypical subspecies revealed two additional subtle differences in sculpture: clypeus with more defined punctures less tending to form longitudinal striae and mesoscutum and metasoma with slightly sparser punctures. In addition, DNA barcoding of one of the two specimens resulted in a sequence presenting a genetic distance of 6.64% from the nominotypical subspecies ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). The weak morphological differences and the low genetic distance would suggest synonymizing the subspecies puniceus with the nominotypical one, however, the two subspecies do not seem to present intermediate forms as regards the chromatic pattern and the subspecies puniceus is currently known only from a very isolated locality in the Libyan desert, thus indicating a certain degree of isolation between the two populations. Since this could be a case analogous to what was observed in the Stenodynerus fastidiosissimus (de Saussure) / S. rufescens Giordani Soika pair ( Selis et al. 2024), in which the females do not show clear morphological differences, we prefer to maintain the subspecies puniceus pending the availability of more material and the discovery of its male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Euodynerus (Euodynerus) bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956
Selis, Marco, Fateryga, Alexander V. & Cilia, Giovanni 2024 |
Euodynerus bidentatus puniceus Blüthgen, 1956: 313
Bluthgen, P. 1956: 313 |