Halecium exaggeratum Peña Cantero, Boero & Piraino, 2013

ÁLVARO L. PEÑA CANTERO, 2017, Benthic hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the Ross Sea (Antarctica) collected by the New Zealand Antarctic expedition BioRoss 2004 with RV Tangaroa, Zootaxa 4293 (1), pp. 1-65 : 48-50

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4293.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6FF96B5C-1F80-47ED-9962-19603DCBF550

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4386885

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C84B87CA-CC39-FF84-E8DD-04E20CB8F7FB

treatment provided by

Plazi (2017-07-15 08:54:54, last updated 2024-11-24 23:40:41)

scientific name

Halecium exaggeratum Peña Cantero, Boero & Piraino, 2013
status

 

Halecium exaggeratum Peña Cantero, Boero & Piraino, 2013 View in CoL

( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 C–E, 16A–B)

Halecium exaggeratum Peña Cantero et al., 2013: 743 View in CoL , fig. 6d, e; Peña Cantero, 2014b: 255 –256, fig. 5K (synonymy).

Material examined. Stn 67, polysiphonic stem 60 mm high on bryozoan, with male gonothecae, basibiont of Hebella plana (NIWA 117593).

Description. Stem 60 mm high, strongly polysiphonic, irregularly branched. Some primary branches also polysiphonic, very long, becoming second-order stems. Secondary stems give rise to other branches, some also distinctly polysiphonic, becoming lower-order stems. Branching up to five-order. Stem and branches divided into internodes by alternately arranged oblique nodes. Internodes slightly arranged in zigzag. Branches typically originating from hydrophores ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 C); usually as single branches, although few paired branches, arising from opposite sides of hydrophore, also present. Some branches originating from hydrothecae.

Hydrophores long, free, with distal hydrotheca ( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 C–D, 16A); ratio adcauline length of hydrophore:diameter at diaphragm 1.3–2.5. Hydrophores straight, regularly diverging from internode. Hydrothecae extensively surpassing distal node of internode ( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 C–D).

Hydrotheca low, widening distally, more adcaudally. Rim markedly everted ( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 C–D, 16A). No pseudodiaphragm. Usually single secondary hydrotheca at end of relatively long pedicel, sometimes with several basal rings.

Gonothecae flattened, triangular, strongly narrowing at base ( Figs 15 View FIGURE 15 E, 16B).

Measurements (in µm). Hydrothecae: diameter at aperture 150–170, diameter at diaphragm 100–115, height 40–50. Hydrophore: adcauline length 140–270. Gonothecae: height 730–840, maximum diameter 650–700. Cnidome: microbasic euryteles (7.5– 8 x 4–4.5) and microbasic mastigophores (6.5– 7 x 2 µm).

Remarks. The present material differs from the concept of this species in being polysiphonic (cf. Peña Cantero 2014b). However, the polysiphonic/monosiphonic condition could be related to the degree of colonial development. Only stems up to 15 mm high had been reported, whereas the present material reaches 60 mm in height. The studied material also differs in having a slightly lower ratio between adcauline length of hydrophore and diameter at diaphragm than in the original description (2.5–3.3 see Peña Cantero et al. 2013), although similar to that of other material brought to this species by Peña Cantero (2014b). The diameter at the hydrothecal aperture is also slightly smaller than in the original description (200–215 µm, see Peña Cantero et al. 2013). However, the present material perfectly agrees in the remaining trophosome characteristics and even in the shape and size of the gonothecae described by Blanco (1984: pl. 5 fig. 13). It also shares the type and size of nematocysts.

Ecology and distribution. Recently reviewed by Peña Cantero et al. (2013) and Peña Cantero (2014b). Shelf species (Peña Cantero et al. 2013), found at depths between 25 (Peña Cantero et al. 2013) and 350 m ( Hartlaub 1904); present material between 272 and 286 m, epibiotic on a bryozoan and basibiont of H. plana , and with gonothecae in February.

Circum-Antarctic distribution (Peña Cantero et al. 2013). In the Ross Sea, already known from Tethys Bay (Peña Cantero et al. 2013). Present material collected off Cape Hallet.

Pena Cantero, A. L. (2014 b) Revision of the Antarctic species of Halecium Oken, 1815 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Haleciidae). Zootaxa, 3790 (2), 243 - 280.

Blanco, O. M. (1984) Contribucion al conocimiento de hidrozoos antarticos y subantarticos. Contribuciones del Instituto Antartico Argentino, 294, 1 - 53, pls. 1 - 47.

Hartlaub, C. (1904) Hydroiden. In: Expedition antarctique Belge. Resultats du voyage du S. Y. Belgica en 1897 - 1899. Rapports scientifiques, Zoologie, 1 - 19.

Pena Cantero, A. L., Boero, F. & Piraino, S. (2013) Shallow-water benthic hydroids from Tethys Bay (Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea, Antarctica). Polar Biology, 36, 731 - 753.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 15. Halecium banzare Watson, 2008: A, internodes with primary and second-order hydrothecae; B, gonotheca. Halecium exaggeratum Peña Cantero, Boero & Piraino, 2013: C, internode with primary and secondary hydrotheca as well as lower-order branch; D, internodes with primary hydrothecae; E, gonotheca. Halecium interpolatum Ritchie, 1907: F, internode with primary hydrotheca and internode structure. Halecium jaederholmi Vervoort, 1972: G, internodes with primary hydrothecae. Halecium secundum Jäderholm, 1904: H, internode with primary hydrotheca. (A from Stn 53; B from Stn 139; C – E, H from Stn 67; F from Stn 107; G from Stn 112). Scale bar: 250 µm.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Cnidaria

Class

Hydrozoa

SuperOrder

Leptothecata

Order

Leptothecata

Family

Haleciidae

Genus

Halecium