Lathys humilis (Blackwall, 1855)

Marusik, Yuri, Koponen, Seppo & Fritzén, Niclas, 2009, On two sibling Lathys species (Araneae, Dictynidae) from northern Europe, ZooKeys 16 (16), pp. 181-195 : 184-189

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.16.228

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3793512

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C7090247-CE36-E263-D7CF-1744FE9F2DCC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Lathys humilis (Blackwall, 1855)
status

 

Lathys humilis (Blackwall, 1855) View in CoL

Figs 1-3 View Figures 1-6 , 7-9 View Figures 7-12 , 13-16 View Figures 13-19 , 20-22 View Figures 20-25 , 26-27 View Figures 26-32

L. h.: Wiehle 1953: 102, f. 222-227 (♁ ♀).

L. h.: Thaler 1981: 127, f. 77-79, 85-86 (♁ ♀).

L. h.: Almquist 2006: 319, f. 280a-h (♁ ♀).

For other references, see Platnick (2009). Some of them may refer to L. nielseni View in CoL or other species.

Misidentifications:

L. h.: Schenkel 1936: 14, f. 1a-b (♀). May refer to undescribed species.

L. h.: Lehtinen 1967: 242, f. 264 (♁). Refers to L. nielseni View in CoL .

L. h.: Palmgren 1977: 22, f. 4.20-24 (♁ ♀). Refers to L. nielseni View in CoL .

L. h.: Paik 1978: 185, f. 75.1-5 (♀). Seems to refer to L. maculosa (Karsch, 1879) View in CoL . L. h.: Hu 1984: 60, f. 55. 1-2 (♀). Refers to L. nielseni View in CoL .

L. h.: Zhu 1985: 58, f. 48a-c (♁). May refer to L. nielseni View in CoL or to L. annulata View in CoL .

L. h.: Song et al. 1999: 364, f. 215N (♁). May refer to L. nielseni View in CoL or to L. annulata View in CoL . L. h.: Song et al. 2001: 287, f. 181A-B (♁). May refer to L. nielseni View in CoL or to L. annulata View in CoL .

Material examined. DENMARK: 1♀ ( ZMT: AA 11.130 View Materials ), Bornholm Isl., Ibsker, Paradisbakkerne Grydedal , in small sphagnum beds around a small pond, 30.06.1967 (P.T. Lehtinen) . BULGARIA: 1♀ ( ZMMU), Blagoevgrad Distr., Rila Mt. range, ESE slope of Karpatnik Mt., Bodovitsa River Valley , right riverside, ca 3.8 km WNW of Bachevo, Pinus Fagus forest, 41°56’12”N, 23°24’09”E, 1230 m, 10.08.2005 ( A. Gromov) GoogleMaps . UKRAINE: 35♁ ♀ ( ZMUT, ZMMU) Crimea, Simferopol Distr., Chatyr-Dagh Mt. , 23.04.2000 (D.S. Letova) ; Feodosya Distr., Karadag Nature Reserve, Kara-Agach Mt. , Juniperus excelsa , sweeping, 14- 16.05.2008 ( A. A. Nadolny ) ; Yalta Distr., Martyan Cape Reserve , 30.04.- 13.05.2007 (M.M. Kovblyuk) ; 1♁ ( ZMMU), Ternopil’ Area, environs of Dzvynyach Village , old nest of Sylvia atricapilla , on bush 0.9 m above the ground, 5.05.2006 (M. Fedo- ryak) . AZERBAIJAN: 2♁ 31♀ ( ZMMU), SE Azerbaijan, Lenkoran Dist., environs of Aurora Village , 38°40’N 48°52’E, 23- 28.04.2001 (Yu.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps ; 1♁ ( ZMMU) same locality and collector, 21- 29.05.2003 GoogleMaps ; 2♀ ( ZMMU), SE Azerbaijan, Lenkoran Distr., Hyrcan Reserve, environs of Apo Village , 38°38’N 48°47’E, 28.05.2003 (Yu.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps ; 1♁ ( ZMMU), SE Azerbaijan, ca 10 km W of Astara Village , Isti-Su, 38°27’N 48°47’E, 25.04.2001 (Yu.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps . IRAN: 2♀ ( ZMMU), Mazandaran Prov., Nashtarood-Khoshkadaran , 51.033°E 36.750°N, 9- 10.06.2000 (Yu.M. Marusik) GoogleMaps .

Description. Measurements (Crimean specimens). Male. Total length 1.7; carapace 0.9 long, 0.7 wide, 0.4 high; chelicerae 0.5 long. Variation (n=2): total length 1.6-1.7; carapace 0.8-0.9 long, 0.6-0.7 wide; 0.4 high.

Length of leg segments:
  femur patella tibia metatarsus tarsus total
I 0.8 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.4 2.8
II 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 2.2
III 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.7
IV 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 2.0
Female. Total length 1.9; carapace 0.8 long, 0.6 wide, 0.4 high; chelicerae 0.4 long. Variation (n=3): total length 1.9; carapace 0.8-0.9 long; 0.6 wide, 0.4 high. Length of leg segments:
  femur patella tibia metatarsus tarsus total
I 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.3 2.3
II 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 1.8
III 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 1.6
IV 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 1.9

Colouration. Carapace in both sexes without distinct pattern. Males slightly dark- er than females. Abdomen with distinct pattern consisting of white guanine dots, black pigment (cardiac mark, sides, and wide posterior band). Legs with distinct annulations.

Copulatory organs. Male palp ( Figs 7-9 View Figures 7-12 , 13-16 View Figures 13-19 ) with patellar apophysis, tibia with three apophyses (retrolateral dorsal, retroventral and retrolateral (or intermediate) that fix (lock) terminal part of conductor. Conductor very long with two arms. Upper arm coiled, and terminal part spine-like and slightly twisted. Epigyne as in Figs 20 View Figures 20-25 , 26-27 View Figures 26-32 with one shallow fovea, and copulatory openings placed in apical-lateral part of fovea. Receptacula droplet-shaped. Insemination ducts short and forming one turn.

Diagnosis. Lathys humilis can be easily distinguished from the closely related L. nielseni by the abdominal pattern consisting of dark stripes and white spots formed from guanine deposits ( Figs 1-3 View Figures 1-6 ). White guanine deposits are totally absent in L. nielseni ( Figs 4-6 View Figures 1-6 ). The two species can also be separated on the basis of the copulatory organs. The epigyne of L. humilis has shorter insemination ducts turned upwards in

the place where they are attached to the spermathecae. The females also differ in the shape of the fovea (cf. Figs 20 View Figures 20-25 , 30 View Figures 26-32 ). In L. humilis the epigynal fovea is subdivided by the septum, fovea deep with distinct margins (there is no septum and there are no distinct margins of the fovea in L. nielseni ). The male palps of the two species are more similar than the epigynes. The two species can be separated by the thicker and broader patellar apophysis in L. humilis , the shape of the dorsal tibial apophysis, and the thicker and longer tip of the conductor in L. humilis .

L. humilis can be distinguished from the Japanese L. annulata , treated for a long time as a junior synonym, by its droplet-shaped spermathecae and its shorter insemination duct forming one loop only (vs. round spermathecae and insemination ducts forming several coils, cf. figs 10-12 in Ono 2003).

Distribution. According to the Platnick’s (2009) catalogue, this species has a Palaearctic (=trans-Palaearctic) distribution with several records from China (Shandong, Anhui, Shanxi and Gansu), Taiwan and Korea. Judging from the figures of the Chinese specimens, all records of L. humilis refer to L. nielseni or another species (males of L. annulata are unknown). Judging from the figures (cf. Fig. 32 View Figures 26-32 ) the record of this species from Shandong ( Hu 1984) refers to L. nielseni . Other records of L. humilis from eastern China based on males may also refer to L. nielseni or L. annulata . The actual species belonging of “ L. humilis ” from Gansu ( Schenkel 1936) remains unclear. Figures of the epigyne made by Schenkel are dissimilar to those of L. humilis or L. nielseni . The specimen stored in the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm lacks an epigyne and the abdominal pattern is indistinct. The record of this species from Korea ( Paik 1978) refers to L. maculosa (Karsch, 1879) , which belongs to the Lathys stigmatisata -group. According to our studies of the Palaearctic Lathys , L. humilis seems to be distributed from western Europe to Caucasus and Mazandaran, northern Iran (see “material examined”). The overlapping ranges of L. humilis and L. nielseni in SW Sweden may be caused partly by misidentifications. Both species were found, however, in samples from Öland in the Swedish Museum of Natural History.

Habitats. According to Hänggi et al. (1995), L. humilis is found in Europe especially in coniferous forests (both spruce and pine), on the forests’ edges, in field shrubs and hedges, and less frequently in deciduous forests. It has been collected mostly on trees, both in canopies and on stems ( Hänggi et al. 1995). According to Roberts (1995), in Great Britain it occurs on bushes and trees with small, hard leaves (heather, gorse, box, yew). Harvey et al. (2002) reported this species from bushes and trees in woodland and scrub, on oak, yew, pines, gorse, etc. It may also be fairly common on ornamental evergreen and privet hedges in parks and gardens; juveniles overwinter in leaf litter, brushwood, under bark and in other similar places ( Harvey et al. 2002). In Sweden the species was reported from litter in dry pine forests, from Calluna -stands and from litter in woods with oaks and on limestone ( Almquist 2006).

Note. Lehtinen (1967) synonymised three species with L. humilis : L. annulata ( Japan) , Altella nielseni Schenkel, 1932 ( Sweden) and Altella lathysoides Denis, 1937 ( Algeria) . The first two names were removed from synonymy by Ono (2003) and Thaler (1981) respectively.

ZMT

Georgian State Museum, Zoological Section

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

ZMUT

University of Tokyo, Department of Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Dictynidae

Genus

Lathys

Loc

Lathys humilis (Blackwall, 1855)

Marusik, Yuri, Koponen, Seppo & Fritzén, Niclas 2009
2009
Loc

L. h.: Wiehle 1953: 102
Loc

L. h.: Thaler 1981: 127
Loc

L. h.: Almquist 2006: 319
Loc

Schenkel 1936: 14
Loc

L. nielseni

Lehtinen 1967: 242
Loc

L. nielseni

Palmgren 1977: 22
Loc

L. maculosa (Karsch, 1879)

Paik 1978: 185
Hu 1984: 60
Loc

L. nielseni

Zhu 1985: 58
Loc

L. nielseni

Song et al. 1999: 364
Song et al. 2001: 287
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF