Tmethypocoelis celebensis, Murniati & Asakura & Davie, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1156.98930 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2C1EAA98-1515-4873-872B-426299C98FAD |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FA9B855D-5FE2-4007-BE15-EA27215DFD7E |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:FA9B855D-5FE2-4007-BE15-EA27215DFD7E |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Tmethypocoelis celebensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov.
Figs 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12 , 13 View Figure 13 , 14 View Figure 14 , 15 View Figure 15 , 16 View Figure 16 , 17B, D View Figure 17
Material examined.
Holotype. Indonesia • 1 ♂ (7.4 × 4.3 mm); Moletang River estuary, Kema Tiga, North Minahasa , North Sulawesi; 1°21'59.6"N, 125°04'38.9"E; 12 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati and D. Nurdiansyah; MZB. Cru. 5574. GoogleMaps
Paratypes. Indonesia • 10 ♂ (2.8 × 1.8 - 7.2 × 4.3 mm) , 8 ♀ (4.8 × 3.6 - 5.7 × 3.7 mm); Moletang River estuary, Kema Tiga, North Minahasa , North Sulawesi; 1°21'59.6"N, 125°04'38.9"E; 12 Sep. 2020; coll. DC. Murniati and D. Nurdiansyah; MZB. Cru. 5180 GoogleMaps • 10 ♂ (5.4 × 3.2 - 6.5 × 3.7 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow , North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; MZB. Cru. 5181 GoogleMaps • 11 ♂ (6.3 × 3.8 - 7.9 × 4.8 mm); Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 0°24'41.0"N, 121°07'43.9"E; 10 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati; MZB. Cru. 5575 GoogleMaps • 10 ♂ (7.3 × 3.8 - 7.4 × 4.3 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; MZB. Cru. 5576 GoogleMaps • 5 ♂ (5.2 × 3.0 - 6.0 × 3.4 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow , North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; ZRC 2023.0056 GoogleMaps • 4 ♂ (6.6 × 3.8 - 7.2 × 4.1 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; ZRC. 2023.0057 GoogleMaps • 5 ♂ (4.7 × 3.0 - 6.0 × 3.7 mm); Iyok Beach, East Bolang Mongondow , North Sulawesi; 0°35'06.0"N, 124°31'58.6"E; 17 Sep. 2020; coll. D. Nurdiansyah; OMNH-Ar.12770-12774 GoogleMaps • 4 ♂ (6.6 × 3.8 - 7.8 × 4.4 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; OMNH-Ar. 12766-12769 GoogleMaps • 4 ♂ (6.2 × 3.7 - 7.4 × 4.5 mm); Maleyali, Sausu, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 1°05'31.0"S, 120°33'39.6"E; 25 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati, Muslihun, M. Ikram; RMNH.CRUS.D.58047 GoogleMaps • 3 ♂ (4.3 × 3.8 - 4.9 × 3.8 mm); Tuladenggi Sibatang, Parigi Moutong , Central Sulawesi; 0°24'41.0"N, 121°07'43.9"E; 10 Jun. 2021; coll. DC. Murniati; QM W29643 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Comparative material.
Tmethypocoelis liki Murniati, Asakura, Nugroho, Hernawan & Dharmawan, 2022: Indonesia • paratypes 5 ♂ (5.3 × 3.1 mm - 5.5 × 3.2 mm); Liki Village, Sarmi District, Sarmi Municipality , Liki Island , Papua Province; 01°37'25.29"S, 138°44'26.54"E; 21 Nov. 2018; coll. DC. Murniati; MZB.Cru.5012 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
Carapace pentagonal, ca. 1.6-1.7 × as wide as long (Fig. 10A View Figure 10 ). Branchial region sloping, protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Posterior margin slightly concave, ca. 0.64 distance between exorbital angles. Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forward (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ). Second anterolateral tooth less acute, slightly shorter. Male pleon ca. 2.0 × longer than wide (Fig. 12E View Figure 12 ). Male chelipeds long. Palm bulky, ca. 1.3 × longer than wide (Fig. 13M, N View Figure 13 ). Fingers shorter than palm. Pollex short, triangular, cutting margin slightly oblique, without large differentiated tooth or lobe (Fig. 13M View Figure 13 ); cutting margin of dactylus with large teeth over proximal half, small teeth on distal half, without median lobe, upper margin with row of fine tubercles; one triangular, upturned tooth subdistally (Fig. 13M-O View Figure 13 ). G1 long, recurved, very slender; sub-proximal portion bulging (Fig. 15A, B View Figure 15 ); apical portion forming two lobes, with three short setae on outer margin, two or three long setae apically, four or five short setae on inner margin (Fig. 15C, D View Figure 15 ).
Description.
Carapace (Figs 10A View Figure 10 , 12A View Figure 12 ) pentagonal; weakly convex laterally and longitudinally; ca. 1.6-1.7 × wider than long. Dorsal surface smooth, regions semi-defined; epigastric lobe poorly defined. Cervical grooves, well-marked; cardiac region slightly depressed. Branchial regions sloping, protobranchial, mesobranchial and metabranchial regions well-defined. Carapace widest between exorbital angles. Sub-branchial region bulging, bearing regular setae and tubercles. Intestinal and branchial regions well-defined. Posterior margin weakly concave, ca. 0.6 × distance between exorbital angles; fine ridge parallel with posterior margin forming broad rim. Lateral margin recurved with row of tubercles and short stout setae. Frontal margin rounded, moderately convergent, basal width ca. 0.19 × distance between exorbital angles, ca. 0.13 × at anterior margin; anterior margin with small central blunt prominence (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). Exorbital angle triangular, acute, directed forwardly; anterior margin with microscopic tubercles, lateral margin slightly tubercular; posteriorly followed by broad U-shaped sinus. Epibranchial tooth less acute, slightly shorter. Posterolateral facet well-defined by a crest originating anteriorly from base of exorbital angle (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ). Supra-orbital borders sinuous, sloping backward, microscopically tubercular. Infra-orbital border with medial notch; pterygostome with inwardly directed oblique channel. Inner part of infra-orbital border with two granular ridges separated by shallow channel; upper ridge with row of setae; granules on lower ridge larger than that of upper ridge, without setation. Outer part of infra-orbital border granular, concave, ending in broad notch below exorbital angle (Fig. 12B View Figure 12 ).
Eyestalks (Figs 10 View Figure 10 , 11A View Figure 11 , 12C View Figure 12 ) reaching exorbital angle, medial and distal diameters similar size; ocular style as long as cornea, tipped with setae; medial slope gives twisted appearance; cornea bulging.
Third maxillipeds (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ) slightly vaulted, not completely covering buccal cavern. Ischium subquadrate, outer surface covered with spaced long setae, with one oblique row of long setae near upper margin, upper margin concave, upper-mesial angle with narrow, rounded lobe; lower-mesial angle curved; inner and lower margins with dense setae; lateral margin without setation (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). Merus slightly larger than ischium, ca. 1.3 × longer; outer surface with regularly scattered short setae; lateral margin convex, narrower distally, covered with short setae; mesial margin straight with long setae (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). Carpus trihedral, subequal in length to propodus and dactylus together; mesial margin and distal portion with dense long setae (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). Propodus shorter than dactylus; margins entire, with long dense setae (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). Dactylus slender, with long dense setae laterally (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ).
Male pleon (Fig. 12E View Figure 12 ) ca. 2.0 × longer than wide. Pl1 trapezoidal, ca. 8.0 × wider than long; ca. 1.3 × wider than pl2. Pl2 very narrow, ca. 10 × wider than long. Pl3 ca. 3 × wider than long. Pl4 ca. 3.2 × wider than long, lateral margins convergent distally, distolateral angle pointed. Pl5 ca. 1.5 × wider than long (at widest point), markedly constricted at base. Pl6 ca. 1.5 × wider than long; widest sub-distally; subequal in length to pl5. Male telson rounded, ca. 1.4 × wider than long (Fig. 12E View Figure 12 ).
Female pleon (Fig. 12F View Figure 12 ) conspicuously broad. Pl1 shortest; pl2 distinctly longer, as wide as pl1; pl3 trapezoidal, longer than pl2; pl4 rectangular, slightly longer than pl3, lateral margins convex; pl5 longer than pl4; pl6 distinctly longest. Female telson (Fig. 12F View Figure 12 ) triangular.
Male chelipeds stout, long, equal. Merus triangular in cross-section; standing higher than exorbital angle (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ); lower margin with two rows of granules extending whole length of margin (Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ); upper margin narrowing proximally, with irregular rows of granules on distal half (Fig. 13K View Figure 13 ); outer margin with one row of granules extending whole length (Fig. 13L View Figure 13 ); upper surface flattened, ovate smooth tympanum, scattered long setae around tympanum, more setation distally, microscopically tuberculate (Fig. 13I View Figure 13 ); lower surface flattened, nearly smooth, with scattered granules, lacking tympanum (Fig. 13J View Figure 13 ); outer surface convex, tympanum smaller than that of upper surface, evenly distributed granules and setae (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ). Carpus shorter than merus, elongate, ca. 1.4 × longer than wide; upper and lower margins tubercular (Fig. 13C, D View Figure 13 ); outer surface rectangular, scattered microscopic granules near upper and lower margins, median portion without microscopic tubercles (Fig. 13E View Figure 13 ); lower surface smooth, with one longitudinal row of granules, one patch of tubercles on proximal part (Fig. 13F View Figure 13 ). Palm bulky, ca. 1.3 × longer than wide; inner surface granular over upper half, with granules extending over upper margin and curved to sharply cut upper margin of outer surface, distally with one row of regular granules reaching pollex, smaller granules near lower margin, median portion smooth (Fig. 13M View Figure 13 ); outer surface distinctly granular over upper half reaching to base of pollex, lower half smooth (Fig. 13N View Figure 13 ); upper margin with one row of granules, distinct groove extending below granular rows forming clear granular string (Fig. 13G View Figure 13 ); lower margin with granulation extending to lower part of inner surface (Fig. 13H View Figure 13 ). Fingers shorter than palm, lacking obvious basal gape, curved inwards, spooned-tip; cutting margins evenly serrated; inner margin at tip of both fingers with short row of stout setae. Pollex short, triangular, cutting margin slightly oblique, without large differentiated tooth or lobe, ca. 0.5 × as long as palm; inner surface nearly smooth, one row of granules over proximal half (Fig. 13M View Figure 13 ); outer surface granular parallel to cutting margin, granules with similar size (Fig. 13N View Figure 13 ); lower margin granulated only along proximo-medially (Fig. 13H View Figure 13 ). Cutting margin of dactylus with teeth, larger teeth over proximal half, smaller teeth over distal half, without median lobe; inner surface with one row of granules parallel to upper margin, granulation extending from proximal to distal, one patch of granules proximally (Fig. 13M View Figure 13 ); band of granules on outer surface near cutting margin and junction to palm, one tubercular ridge extending medially parallel to upper margin (Fig. 13N View Figure 13 ); upper margin with row of tubercles terminating with triangular upturned tooth subdistally (Fig. 13O View Figure 13 ).
Female chelipeds small dotillid type (Figs 10B View Figure 10 , 14 View Figure 14 ). Not conspicuously different from T. simplex sp. nov. (see description for T. simplex sp. nov.).
Pereiopods (Fig. 15 View Figure 15 ) slender, elongate, P2-P5 similar; smooth ovate tympanum on anterior and posterior surfaces of meri. Tympani on posterior surfaces becoming progressively smaller from P2-P5. Dactyli nearly straight, pointed, shorter than propodi.
P2 (Fig. 15A, B View Figure 15 ) shorter than P3; merus ca. 2.7 × longer than wide; anterior surface bearing scattered granules outside tympanum, granules denser near lower margin, sparse setae near lower margin; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser distal to tympanum; upper margin convex, sparse long setae, distally tubercular; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins without granules, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces with few small granules only; margins with sparse long setae.
P3 (Fig. 15C, D View Figure 15 ) longest; merus ca. 2.7 × longer than wide; anterior surface scarcely granular; posterior surface sparsely granulate, denser near upper margin; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin tubercular distally, sparse long setae; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces nearly smooth, sparse setae distally; margins without tubercles, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.
P4 (Fig. 15E, F View Figure 15 ) nearly as long as P2; merus ca. 2.6 × longer than wide; anterior surface scarcely granular; posterior surface with evenly distributed granules; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin tubercular distally, spaced long setae extending whole length; lower margin smooth, sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.
P5 (Fig. 15G, H View Figure 15 ) shortest; merus ca. 2.8 × longer than wide; anterior surface without granules; posterior surface granulate, granules denser near upper margin; upper and lower margins convex; upper margin sparsely tubercular, with sparse long setae, short setae proximally; lower margin smooth, with sparse setae. Carpus shorter than propodus, surfaces smooth; margins smooth, with sparse setae. Propodus with anterior and posterior surfaces smooth; margins with sparse long setae.
Reproductive organs. G1 long, recurved, very slender; sub-proximal portion bulging (Fig. 16A, B View Figure 16 ); apical portion forming two lobes, with three short setae on outer margin, two or three long setae apically, four or five short setae on mesial margin (Fig. 16C, D View Figure 16 ). Vulva (Fig. 16E View Figure 16 ) rounded, projecting.
Gastric mill. Median tooth plate simple, without defined ridges. Urocardiac ossicle relatively narrower throughout length. Propyloric ossicle semi-circular, relatively narrow and protruding; posterior margin curved; anterior margin with one pointed lobe medially; lateral margins quadrate with anterior lobes discrete, prominent, and rounded (Fig. 17B View Figure 17 ). Lateral zygocardiac tooth plate with eight slender teeth, three anterior teeth large (Fig. 17D View Figure 17 ).
Habitat.
Tmethypocoelis celebensis sp. nov. inhabits sandy substrata in estuarine areas (Fig. 18 View Figure 18 ).
Etymology.
The species name is derived from the type locality. Celebes is the former name of Sulawesi Island, one of the great islands in Indonesia.
Remarks.
The two new species described here differ from each other and from the other known species by numerous characters compared below. In general, the species of Tmethypocoelis are all extremely similar in general morphology with only small differences in male cheliped shape and dentition (Table 1 View Table 1 ), differences in the apical setal ornamentation of the male first gonopod, and sometimes differences in the proportions of the somites of the male pleon.
A comparison of male first gonopod setation patterns of described species suggests that the possession of two or three of markedly elongated apical setae (Figs 8C-E View Figure 8 , 16C, D View Figure 16 ; Davie 1990: fig. 2), common to both Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov., is so far shared with T. liki from Papua and T. koelbeli from the Northern Territory, NW Australia. Therefore, these four species may be more closely related to each other than they are to T. ceratophora , T. choreutes , and T. odontodactylus , which all share a coronet of shorter more evenly sized stout setae on the tip of the G1. A more thorough analysis of relationships within the genus will be undertaken as part of a larger revision of the genus, and with the help of DNA sequencing data.
Both Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. differ significantly from T. koelbeli in the shape of the male pleon, with that of T. koelbeli being relatively narrower, and in particular Pl5 being more constricted proximally (Table 2 View Table 2 ). The pleons of T. simplex sp. nov. and T. celebensis sp. nov. are similar, however, both Pl6 and the telson are slightly proportionately wider in T. celebensis sp. nov.
Tmethypocoelis simplex sp. nov. differs from T. celebensis sp. nov., T. koelbeli , and T. liki in the form and number of the apical setae of the G1. The G1 of T. simplex sp. nov. typically has two or three very long setae apically (Fig. 8C-E View Figure 8 ), and subapically there are three shorter stout setae on the outer margin increasing in length distally, and four short, downwardly reflexed setae on inner lobe. The G1 of T. celebensis sp. nov. has two or three very long recurved setae apically (Fig. 16B-D View Figure 16 ), and subapically there are also three stout setae on the outer margin, though the proximal seta is much smaller and less prominent than on T. simplex sp. nov., and also four or five short, downwardly reflexed setae on the inner lobe. The G1 of T. koelbeli similarly has two long apical setae but lacks a row of outer subapical setae and has a row of five short distally pointed setae on the inner lobe ( Davie 1990: fig. 2). The G1 of T. liki has one long and five short apical setae ( Murniati et al. 2022: fig. 20C).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |