Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316519 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11342123 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C3659BCA-AFB2-F6A7-2F85-48DE127A3C98 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko 1905 |
status |
|
Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko 1905 View in CoL
Sorex thibetanus Kastschenko 1905 View in CoL , Izv. Tomsk. Univ., 27: 93.
Type Locality: "Tsaidam" [NE Tibet, China].
Vernacular Names: Tibetan Shrew.
Distribution: Himalyas and NE Tibet.
Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc).
Discussion: The pygmy shrews of the Himalayas are still a subject of controversy. The original description of thibetanus (as a subspecies of minutus ) is not very informative; the holotype in the Tomsk Academy was considered to be lost (Yudin, pers. comm. 1977), which is why Hutterer (1979) regarded thibetanus as a nomen dubium. Dolgov and Hoffmann (1977) and later Hoffmann (1987) used thibetanus to define a Himalayan species in which they included buchariensis , kozlovi , planiceps , and specimens from Nepal and China reported as minutus by various authors. Hutterer (1979) instead recognized three species, buchariensis , planiceps , and minutus as occurring in the Himalayas and regarded kozlovi and thibetanus as indeterminable. Zaitsev (1988) pointed out differences between buchariensis and thibetanus . Surprisingly, the holotype of thibetanus turned up in the Zoological Museum of Moscow ( Baranova et al., 1981) and Hoffmann (1987) reported on its measurements. Hoffmann (1996 a, b) provided a distribution map for all known specimens of thibetanus , kozlovi , buchariensis , and planiceps , which he understood as subspecies of S. thibetanus . However, in the light of drastic size and tooth shape differences among these taxa, and in the light of subtle differences between better-known small Sorex species ( minutus and volnuchini , caecutiens and shinto ), I prefer to list buchariensis , kozlovi , planiceps , and thibetanus as separate species until a more complete analysis is available.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.