Lepidiota grata Blackburn, 1890
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E69687C-74B4-4087-9BF6-039F5FE14A9E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340903 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C264702F-4534-3510-2BE7-99FEFAF5FD2B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepidiota grata Blackburn, 1890 |
status |
|
Lepidiota grata Blackburn, 1890
Lepidiota grata Blackburn, 1890: 86 .
Lectotype (here designated) male: on card on which specimen mounted, all handwritten: 7905 (in red), additional number (in red, crossed out), ♂ (crossed out), ♀, T (black), N. T. [Northern Territory] (in red), red and black lines | Type H. T. (circular red ringed, typeset) | Blackburn coll. 1910-236 (typeset) | Lepidiota grata, Blackb. (handwritten) | aedeagus dissected out and mounted on card | my lectotype label; in NHML.
Blackburn (1890) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of males (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Lea (1912) noted that the ‘type’ had been sent to NHML, and Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” male from Queensland in NHML. Houston & Weir (1992) listed a “ holotype (probable)”, and Miller & Allsopp (2000) followed this interpretation. As Britton (1978), Houston & Weir (1992), and Miller & Allsopp (2000) provided no discussion and did not label any specimen in NHML, none of these mentions of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the male in NHML the lectotype.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lepidiota grata Blackburn, 1890
Allsopp, Peter G. 2020 |
Lepidiota grata
Blackburn, T. 1890: 86 |