Lepidiota degener Blackburn, 1888
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E69687C-74B4-4087-9BF6-039F5FE14A9E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340960 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C264702F-4531-3512-2BE7-9E29FA97FE7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepidiota degener Blackburn, 1888 |
status |
|
Lepidiota degener Blackburn, 1888
Lepidiota degener Blackburn, 1888b: 853 .
Lectotype (here designated) male ( Figs. 17–19 View FIGURES 17–28. 17–19 ): N. Territory [Northern Territory] (typeset) | LEPIDIOTA de-gener, Blackb. (handwritten by Blackburn) | Type (handwritten in pencil) | I.509 Lepidiota degener Blkb N. Territory (handwritten) TYPE (handwritten in red, at right angle) | SAMA Database No. 25-035293 | my lectotype label; in SAM .
Blackburn (1888b) saw two specimens of unknown genders but did not designate a type (vide Article 72.1.1). Britton (1978) referred to a female “ holotype ” and a female “ paratype ”, both from “ Northern Territory ” and in SAM. This was followed by Houston & Weir (1992). As Britton (1978) and Houston & Weir (1992) provided no discussion and did not label any specimen in SAM as the holotype, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the specimen in SAM labelled as “TYPE” the lectotype. I have not located the second specimen; it must be considered a paralectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lepidiota degener Blackburn, 1888
Allsopp, Peter G. 2020 |
Lepidiota degener
Blackburn, T. 1888: 853 |