Lepidiota rubrior Blackburn, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E69687C-74B4-4087-9BF6-039F5FE14A9E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340863 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C264702F-4529-350D-2BE7-9807FEA6FAB7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lepidiota rubrior Blackburn, 1912 |
status |
|
Lepidiota rubrior Blackburn, 1912
Lepidiota rubrior Blackburn, 1912: 55 .
Lepidiota rugicollis Moser, 1913: 50 ; Britton 1978: 71 (synonymy).
Lectotype of Lepidiota rubrior (here designated) female: Type H.T. (circular red ringed, typeset) | 7903 Qu. [Queensland] (red, handwritten) female symbol, T (handwritten) | Blackburn coll. 1910-236 (typeset) | Lepidiota rubrior, Blackb. (handwritten) | my lectotype label; in NHML.
Blackburn (1912) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of females (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Lea (1912) noted that the ‘type’ had been sent to NHML, and Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” female from Queensland in NHML. Houston & Weir (1992) listed a “ holotype (probable)”. As Britton (1978) and Houston & Weir (1992) provided no discussion and did not label any specimen in NHML, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (vide Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the female in NHML the lectotype.
Lectotype of Lepidiota rugicollis (designated by Britton 1978: 72) male ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 29–37. 29–30 ): Queensland Cooktown [15.47°S, 145.25°E] (black bordered, typeset and handwritten) | Lepidiota rugicollis Type Mos (handwritten) | Holo-Type (circular red ringed, typeset and handwritten) | L. grata Blkb. 1890 = L. rugicollis Moser 1913 E.B. Britton det. 1964 (handwritten and typeset) | my lectotype label; in ZMB.
Moser (1913) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of males (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1). Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” male from Silver Valley in ZMB and labelled it as such. Houston & Weir (1992) recognised this status, although neither provided any discussion as to why they considered Moser (1913) might have had only one specimen. As Britton (1978) clearly labelled the male in ZMB, I consider this a lectotype designation by Britton under Article 74.5.
Britton’s label indicates that in 1964 he thought this species was a junior synonym of L. grata Blackburn, 1890 . He, later ( Britton 1978), formally synonymised it under L. rubrior .
A second specimen in ZMB labelled by Brenske with the then unpublished name of “ rugicollis ” ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 29–37. 29–30 ) has no type status .
ZMB |
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lepidiota rubrior Blackburn, 1912
Allsopp, Peter G. 2020 |
Lepidiota rugicollis
Britton, E. B. 1978: 71 |
Moser, J. von 1913: 50 |
Lepidiota rubrior
Blackburn, T. 1912: 55 |