Nocarodeini

Ünal, Mustafa, 2016, Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar, Zootaxa 4206 (1), pp. 1-223 : 90-92

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4206.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1566C02-9987-4116-83AA-91D3D1DCF2FF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5780945

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C24587A5-FFBF-4F0A-FF50-F8A342E5FE92

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Nocarodeini
status

 

Key to genera of Nocarodeini View in CoL

1 Tympanum on the first abdominal tergite present, large well developed, always larger than the neighbour stigmal area ( Figs. 344–346 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); if absent or very small (only in Paranocarodes karabagi View in CoL ) ( Fig. 349 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ) or as wide as the stigmal area ( Paranocarodes chopardi View in CoL ) ( Figs. 347–348 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ) then abdominal tergites (at least the first tergite) sharply and distinctly protruded posteriorly (extending beyond the hind margin of its own tergite) ( Figs. 354 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ).............................................. 2

- Tympanum absent ( Figs. 350–351 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); if present (in several species of Nocaracris View in CoL , N. furvus View in CoL s.l., N. judithae View in CoL , N. minutus View in CoL , N. burri View in CoL , N. rimansonae View in CoL , N. dilekensis View in CoL ) strongly reduced, smaller than the neighbour stigmal area ( Fig. 352 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); if slightly wider than the stigmal area ( N. furvus View in CoL s.l., N. judithae View in CoL , N. minutus View in CoL ) ( Fig. 353 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ) then the first abdominal tergite never protruded posteriorly ( Fig. 355 View FIGURES 344 – 374 )........................................................................................... 7

2 Body strongly depressed dorso-ventrally ( Figs. 517–521 View FIGURES 509 – 521 ); vertex almost smooth, slightly rugose, without supraocellar and supraocular foveolae, with very weak carinae and carinulae ( Fig. 356 View FIGURES 344 – 374 , 519, 521 View FIGURES 509 – 521 ); apical valves of penis strongly compressed laterally, roundly widened and curved backwards ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, d)......................... Neoparanothrotes Mirzayans View in CoL

- Body compressed laterally ( Figs. 509–516 View FIGURES 509 – 521 ); vertex strongly rugose, with very distinct carinae and carinulae, supraocellar and supraocular foveolae distinct ( Fig. 357 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); apical valves of penis not widened and not curved backwards ( Figs. 61 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b–63a, b, d).................................................................................................... 3

3 Vertex very narrow; narrower than the transversal diameter of eye ( Figs. 358–359 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); visible part of apical valves of penis very

long, longer than visible part of basal valves of penis ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, d), epiphallus with simple, linear pseudolophi consist of several spines in one row ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c)...................................................... Pseudonothrotes Mistshenko - Vertex clearly wider than the transversal diameter of eye or at most equal in male ( Fig. 360 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); visible part of apical valves of penis always shorter than visible part of basal valves of penis ( Figs. 58 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, d, 63a, d), epiphallus with oval or rounded pseudolophi consist of many spines (except Eunothrotes derjugini View in CoL ) ( Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c–61c)....................................... 4

4 Arolium very wide, longer than half of claws ( Fig. 361 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); apical valves of penis large and stout, very wide in posterior view; not covered by the sheath of penis ( Figs. 63 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, d); epiphallus with sublinear pseudolophi consist of less spines ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c)........................................................................................... Eunothrotes Adelung View in CoL

- Arolium distinctly narrower and not longer than half of claws ( Fig. 362 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); apical valves of penis smaller and slender, much narrower in posterior view; mostly covered by the sheath of penis (except several species of Paranothrotes View in CoL ) ( Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, d, 56a, d, 58a, d), epiphallus with oval or rounded pseudolophi consist of many spines ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c–61c)......................... 5

5 Median carina of pronotum with distinct longitudinal sulcus mostly along its length ( Fig. 363 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ) or at least anterior part (except doubtful Paranothrotes asulcatus View in CoL ); arch of zygoma on male phallus distinctly raised and sclerotized, higher than posterior lobes of zygoma ( Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, 58a, 59a); mostly but not always, median carinae of pronotum and abdominal tergites simple, not raised and without a sharp posterior projection ( Figs. 495–496 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ) (except Paranothrotes sulcatus , P. margaritae View in CoL , P. siirt View in CoL sp. nov.); fastigium of vertex mostly flat ( Fig. 365 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); antennae long as in Paranocarodes View in CoL (see item 6 below)...................................................................................................... Paranothrotes Mistshenko View in CoL

- Median carina of pronotum without longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 364 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); if present an indistinct one, very thin as a line (in some specimens of Paranocarodes View in CoL ); arch of zygoma on male phallus not raised and not sclerotized, lower than posterior lobes of zygoma ( Figs. 44 View FIGURES 44 – 54 a–54a); mostly but not always, median carinae of pronotum and abdominal tergites raised, with a sharp posterior projection ( Figs. 411–412 View FIGURES 395 – 412 ) (except Ebnerodes toelgi View in CoL , Paranocarodes beieri View in CoL ); fastigium of vertex depressed ( Fig. 366 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); antennae short in Ebnerodes View in CoL , long in Paranocarodes View in CoL (see item 6 below)......................................... 6

6 Abdominal tergites simple, not raised and without sharp projection at posterior margin ( Fig. 437–438 View FIGURES 425 – 438 ); median carina of pronotum not raised almost indistinct, strongly granulate; head relatively large ( Figs. 367–368 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); vertex sloping ( Figs. 367–368 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); antennae very short not reaching to ventral margin of labrum in female ( Fig. 368 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ), at most slightly surpassing it in male; in normal body form, male abdomen (also female) long reaching to half of hind tibia when the legs stretched backwards ( Figs. 437 View FIGURES 425 – 438 ); hind tibia bright orange................................................................. Ebnerodes Ramme View in CoL

- Abdominal tergites raised and with a sharp projection at posterior margin ( Figs. 411–412 View FIGURES 395 – 412 ); median carina of pronotum raised and very distinct; if granulate then hind tibia black or blackish red; head smaller ( Figs. 369–370 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); vertex not sloping as in Ebnerodes View in CoL ( Figs. 369–370 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); antennae long surpassing far beyond ventral margin of labrum in both sexes ( Figs. 369–370 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); in normal body form, male abdomen short, never reaching to half of hind tibia, reaching to slightly beyond the apex of hind femur when the legs stretched backwards ( Figs. 431, 433, 435 View FIGURES 425 – 438 )................................... Paranocarodes I. Bolívar View in CoL

7 Body strongly depressed dorso-ventrally ( Figs. 727-730 View FIGURES 723 – 742 ); vertex completely smooth, no carinula, tubercles or granules; no foveolae ( Figs. 371–372 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); pronotum cylindrical, without lateral carinae; median carina very indistinctly visible with its longitudinal sulcus, but never raised ( Figs. 371–372 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); apical valves of penis not covered by the sheath of penis ventrally ( Figs. 79 View FIGURES 69 – 82 a, d, 80a)....................................................................... Turkanocaracris Ünal View in CoL gen. nov.

- Body strongly to relatively compressed laterally ( Figs. 723–726 View FIGURES 723 – 742 ); vertex clearly rugose, always with carinae, carinulae and granules; foveolae present, at least supraocellar foveola distinct ( Figs. 373–374 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); pronotum mostly roof shaped with raised median carinae, if subcylindrical then median and lateral carinae very distinct ( Figs. 373–374 View FIGURES 344 – 374 ); apical valves of penis covered by the sheath of penis ventrally ( Figs. 70 View FIGURES 69 – 82 a, d).............................................................. 8

8 Dorsal margin of hind femur interrupted in preapical part ( Fig. 375 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); if it is weak then median and lateral carinae of pronotum very distinct and raised; distinctly depressed between the median and lateral carinae, but below portion of the lateral carinae compressed laterally, therefore pronotum not roof shaped; fastigium of vertex horizontal or very slightly sloping, connected to frontal ridge under acute or right angle, sharp in lateral view.................................................. 9

- Dorsal margin of hind femur not interrupted in preapical part ( Fig. 376 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); if it is seen weakly then especially lateral carinae and median carina of pronotum much more indistinct, not raised, body and hind femur clearly stout, pronotum almost roof shaped ( Nocaracris niethammeri View in CoL sp. group); fastigium of vertex sloping, connected to frontal ridge under obtuse rarely right angle, mostly rounded in lateral view (except Araxiana View in CoL )........................................................... 11

9 Frontal ridge in dorsal part distinctly projecting forward in lateral view ( Fig. 377 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); median carina of pronotum with a distinct longitudinal sulcus along its length; prosternum with strongly raised anterior margin as a collar-like, almost covering the mouth parts from below ( Fig. 378 View FIGURES 375 – 394 )....................................................... Iranacris Mistshenko View in CoL

- Frontal ridge in dorsal part slightly projecting forward in lateral view ( Fig. 379 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); median carina of pronotum without longitudinal sulcus or at most visible in anterior part (except Nocarodes ebneri View in CoL ); prosternum slightly raised with a pointed median projection ( Fig. 380 View FIGURES 375 – 394 )................................................................................. 10

10 Pronotum strongly widened in middle part, distinctly wider than its length ( Fig. 381 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); lateral carinae of pronotum weak in prozona, distinct in metazona but not in a carina form, that changed as a swollen ridge reaching to anterior margin of pronotum laterally ( Figs. 381–383 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); apical valves of penis truncate at apex (with an apical notch), stout, S-shaped and curved backwards at apex ( Figs. 91 View FIGURES 83 – 92 a, 92a).......................................................... Bufonocarodes Mistshenko View in CoL

- Pronotum not wider than its length or slightly wider ( Fig. 382 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); lateral carinae of pronotum distinct in prozona and metazona in usual form ( Figs. 382–384 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); if that changed as a swollen ridge and reaching to anterior margin of pronotum laterally then it is sharper and always typical lateral carinae distinct in prozona; apical valves of penis pointed at apex without apical notch ( Figs. 83 View FIGURES 83 – 92 a–90a)................................................................. Nocarodes Fischer von Waldheim View in CoL

11 Body and legs clearly slender ( Figs. 743–744 View FIGURES 743 – 759 ); fastigium of vertex flat, not sloping, connected to frontal ridge angularly in lateral view ( Figs. 385–386 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); upper part of frontal ridge projecting forward; body strongly compressed laterally, therefore

metasternum narrower than the length of meso- and metasterna together ( Fig. 389 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); apical valves of penis slender, strongly covered by the posterior lobes of zygoma, difficult to see in lateral view, their ventral margins not turned laterally, this visible part straight ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 69 – 82 a, d); epiphallus with fused pseudolophi ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 69 – 82 c)......................... Araxiana Mistshenko View in CoL - Body and legs stout ( Figs. 709–722 View FIGURES 709 – 722 ); fastigium of vertex sloping and mostly depressed, connected to frontal ridge roundly in lateral view ( Fig. 387–388 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); upper part of frontal ridge not projecting forward; body mostly depressed, if compressed laterally, then metasternum wider than the length of meso- and metasterna together ( Fig. 390 View FIGURES 375 – 394 ); apical valves of penis stout, partly covered by the sheath of penis, clearly visible in lateral view; their ventral margins always turned laterally, this visible part clearly upcurved ( Figs. 69 View FIGURES 69 – 82 a–78a); epiphallus with separated pseudolophi ( Figs. 69 View FIGURES 69 – 82 c–78c)................... Nocaracris Uvarov View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

Family

Pamphagidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF