Paranothrotes

Ünal, Mustafa, 2016, Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar, Zootaxa 4206 (1), pp. 1-223 : 109-110

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4206.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1566C02-9987-4116-83AA-91D3D1DCF2FF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5780985

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C24587A5-FF8A-4F3C-FF50-FF4742E2FAB7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paranothrotes
status

 

Key to species groups, species and subspecies of Paranothrotes View in CoL

1 Hind femur strongly and irregularly dentate on dorsal margin and with strongly undulate ventral margin ( Fig. 439 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )......................................................................................... P. dentatus Ünal View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Hind femur in usual form, with regularly and finely serrated dorsal margin Figs. 440–442 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ).......................... 2

2 Arolium wide, triangular reaching to half of claws on fore legs ( Fig. 443 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); body very small (female: 27.7 mm, male: unknown)............................................................................... P. buzuldagi Ünal View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Arolium narrow, not reaching to half of claws on fore legs ( Fig. 444 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); body distinctly larger......................... 3

3 Apical valves of penis very slender, small, not covered by the sheath of penis ventrally; lateral aperture of the sheath of penis absent; arch of zygoma strongly widened at apex ( Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, d, 56a, b, d); pseudolophi on epiphallus longitudinally oval ( Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c, 56c); body surface quite smooth, with weak tubercles............................ ( P. opacus View in CoL sp. group)...4

- Apical valves of penis stout and larger, covered by the sheath of penis ventrally in posterior view; lateral aperture of the sheath of penis present; arch of zygoma very narrow ( Figs. 57 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, d, 58a, b, d); pseudolophi on epiphallus transversally oval ( Figs. 57 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c, 58c); body surface always with distinct tubercles........................................................7

4 Arch of zygoma strongly raised ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a); abdominal tergites distinctly raised, with sharp posterior projections ( Figs. 477– 480 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); typical light bands on paranota reaching to median carina in male ( Figs. 477–478 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); body strongly compressed laterally; male phallic complex as in Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c, d................................................. P. sulcatus Bolívar

- Arch of zygoma almost flat or slightly raised ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a); abdominal tergites simple or slightly raised, with very smaller and blunter posterior projections ( Figs. 481–485 View FIGURES 481 – 494 ); typical light bands on paranota reaching to lateral carina in male ( Figs. 481, 483 View FIGURES 481 – 494 ); body relatively less compressed laterally............................................................. 5

5 Vertex in female narrow between the eyes, as wide as vertical diameter of eye or slightly wider (male unknown), with distinct carinulae and tubercles; fastigium of vertex narrow and elongated ( Fig. 445 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )................... P. ocellatus Mistshenko View in CoL

- Vertex in female wide between the eyes, 1.5 times wider than vertical diameter of eye, with weak carinulae and tubercles; fastigium of vertex clearly short and wide ( Fig. 446 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )........................................................... 6

6 Hind tibia orange or bright red in both sexes; male phallic complex as in Figs. 56 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c, d....... P. opacus opacus Brunner View in CoL

- Hind tibia mainly black in both sexes, sometimes blackish or dark red in male; and bluish, greenish, or body color with weak bluish stains or fully body color in female........................................... P. opacus rectus Mistshenko View in CoL

7 Body lighter in both sexes, mostly in various shades of brown; typical light band on abdomen always distinct in male ( Fig. 447 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); median carinula of vertex not reaching to anterior margin of eye; arch of zygoma shorter and wider; hind femur in female yellowish-cream, reddish or light grey on inner surface; ventral surface of hind femur in male at most dark grey; abdominal tergites relatively raised, with a sharp posterior projection ( Figs. 499–506 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ), if simple then body clearly small ( Fig. 497–498 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ).................................................................................................... 8

- Body strongly darkened, blackish dark grey in male, dark brown, blackish-brown or dark grey in female; typical light band on abdomen absent in male ( Fig. 448 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); median carinula of vertex long, reaching to anterior margin of eye; arch of zygoma longer and narrower; hind femur and tibia in both sexes black on inner and ventral surfaces; abdominal tergites simple, not raised, at most with a small posterior projection ( Figs. 507–512 View FIGURES 495 – 508 View FIGURES 509 – 521 ); body distinctly large...................( P. nigripes sp. group)...19

8 Body less compressed laterally and clearly low in lateral view, almost cylindrical (more distinct in female) ( Figs. 486–494 View FIGURES 481 – 494 ); median carina of pronotum and abdominal tergites not raised or slightly raised without posterior projection; basal half of hind femur not strongly widened, gradually narrowing towards genicular lobes (especially in male), dorsal margin very finely serrated ( Fig. 449 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )............................................................... ( P. gotvendicus View in CoL sp. group)...9

- Body compressed laterally and high in lateral view ( Figs. 499–506 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ); median carina of pronotum relatively, abdominal tergites distinctly raised with distinct sharper posterior projection; basal half of hind femur distinctly widened, stout, sharply narrowing towards genicular lobes (especially in male), dorsal margin with more distinct denticles ( Fig. 450 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ).................................................................................................. ( P. margaritae View in CoL sp. group)...16

9 Median carina of pronotum without longitudinal sulcus or distinct only anteriorly, if visible along its length then always clearly narrowing backwards ( Figs. 451–452 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); arch of zygoma not raised ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a).................................... 10

- Median carina of pronotum with a distinct and wide longitudinal sulcus along its length, not narrowing backwards ( Figs. 553– 554 View FIGURES 522 – 554 ); arch of zygoma distinctly raised ( Figs. 58 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, 59a)...................................................... 13

10 Longitudinal sulcus of median carina of pronotum absent; female unknown..................... P. asulcatus Demirsoy View in CoL

- Longitudinal sulcus of median carina of pronotum present at least anteriorly.................................... 11

11 Frontal ridge distinctly incised just below the median ocellus; basal part of supra-anal plate smooth, without median longitudi-

nal sulcus; inner surfaces of hind femur and tibia whitish, slightly reddish. Male unknown.......... P. kosswigi Demirsoy View in CoL - Frontal ridge slightly or not incised just below the median ocellus; supra-anal plate with median longitudinal sulcus along its length; inner surface of hind tibia red or black............................................................ 12

12 Median carina of pronotum with longitudinal sulcus visible only anteriorly ( Fig. 451 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); inner surface of hind tibia red; hind femur with black inner surface; fastigium of vertex strongly depressed................... P. eximius eximius Mistshenko View in CoL

- Median carina of pronotum with a distinct longitudinal sulcus along its length, narrowing backwards ( Fig. 452 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); inner surface of hind tibia black in male, blackish-blue in female; hind femur with body color inner surface; fastigium of vertex flattened in female, slightly depressed in male; male phallic complex as in Figs. 57 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c............. P. eximius bitlis Ünal View in CoL , ssp. nov.

13 Female hind tibia bicolored, proximal part dark blue turning to red apically; found in S.W. Iran....... P. apicalis (Bolívar) View in CoL

- Female hind tibia red, blue or black, if bicolored ( P. demawendi View in CoL ) then proximal part pinkish blue; found in N. Iran...... 14

14 Frons distinctly sloping backwards, fastigium of vertex connected to frontal ridge under acute angle ( Fig. 455 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); male eye large ( Fig. 455 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ) (vertical diameter 1.9 mm, transversal diameter 1.6 mm) 1.5 times wider than the distance between the frontal ridge and eye in lateral view; body low in lateral view (height of pronotum 4.7 mm in male syntype) ( Fig. 492 View FIGURES 481 – 494 ); median carina of pronotum with a distinctly wide longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 453 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); male phallic complex as in Figs. 58 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c, d............................................................................................. P. gotvendicus (I. Bolívar) View in CoL

- Frons more vertical, fastigium of vertex connected to frontal ridge under right angle ( Fig. 456 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); eye distinctly smaller ( Fig. 456 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ) (vertical diameter 1.7 mm, transversal diameter 1.3 mm) only 1.09 times wider than the distance between the frontal ridge and eye in lateral view; body higher in lateral view (height of pronotum 5.1 mm in male paratype of P. tenuicornis View in CoL ) ( Fig. 495 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ); median carina of pronotum with clearly narrower longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 454 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ).................................. 15

15 Hind tibia in male black to dark red (black in the type), in female red to blue (reddish in the type); body more compressed, high in lateral view ( Figs. 495–496 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ); male phallic complex as in Figs. 55 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c.................... P. tenuicornis Mistshenko View in CoL

- Hind tibia in male bright light red, in female pinkish blue in proximal part turning to red at apex or pinkish red along its length; body more cylindrical, lower in lateral view ( Figs. 497–498 View FIGURES 495 – 508 )................................ P. demawendi (Ramme) View in CoL

16 Hind tibia with red or yellow inner surface; male phallic complex as in Figs. 60 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b, c............. P. margaritae (Miram) View in CoL

- Hind tibia with black, bluish-black inner surface.......................................................... 17

17 Body slender, low in lateral view, more compressed laterally ( Fig. 506 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ); vertex narrow, as wide as vertical diameter of eye in female ( Fig. 457 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); hind femur more slender ( Fig. 459 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )..................................... P. nigrolobus Demirsoy View in CoL

- Body larger and stouter, high in lateral view, wide in dorsal view ( Figs. 504–505 View FIGURES 495 – 508 ); vertex wide, 1.3 times wider than vertical diameter of eye in female ( Fig. 458 View FIGURES 439 – 460 ); hind femur stout ( Fig. 460 View FIGURES 439 – 460 )............................................. 18

18 Arch of zygoma narrow; apical notch of apodemes distinct; basal valves of penis strongly widened ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 55 – 68 a, b); epiphallus as in Fig. 61 View FIGURES 55 – 68 c; typical light band on pronotum distinct ( Fig. 461 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); median carina of pronotum with weaker longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 462 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); body large (male: 27–30 mm)................................................. P. siirt Ünal View in CoL , sp. nov.

- Arch of zygoma distinctly wider especially apically; apical notch of apodemes indistinct ( Fig. 465 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); basal valves of penis narrow; epiphallus as in Fig. 466 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ; typical light band on pronotum indistinct ( Fig. 463 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); median carina of pronotum with more distinct longitudinal sulcus ( Fig. 464 View FIGURES 461 – 480 ); body small (male: 21–23 mm); female unknown............... P. citimus Mistshenko View in CoL

19 Median carina of pronotum with a deep and wide longitudinal sulcus along its length in both sexes ( Fig. 467 View FIGURES 461 – 480 )............................................................................................ P. schelkovnikovi (Uvarov) View in CoL

- Median carina of pronotum with a weak, much narrower and shallower longitudinal sulcus in both sexes ( Fig. 468 View FIGURES 461 – 480 )..... 2 0

20 Hind tibia in female with light spines in dorsal view; pseudolophi on epiphallus separated, with 25–26 spines ( Fig. 470 View FIGURES 461 – 480 )...................................................................................... P. ornatus Mistshenko View in CoL

- Hind tibia in female with dark spines in dorsal view; pseudolophi on epiphallus fused in the middle, with 14–16 spines ( Fig. 469 View FIGURES 461 – 480 )......................................................................... P. nigripes (Stshelkanovtzev)

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

SuperFamily

Acridoidea

Family

Pamphagidae

SubFamily

Pamphaginae

Tribe

Nocarodeini

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF