Karaops forteyi Crews, 2013
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1150.93760 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A38C5FB6-9F66-4F85-8788-AAA53D21704D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C17594E2-D1A2-5A5F-93F5-22FB37DE7360 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Karaops forteyi Crews, 2013 |
status |
|
Karaops forteyi Crews, 2013 View in CoL
Fig. 73H, I View Figure 73 , Maps 1 View Map 1 , 9A, B View Map 9
Karaops forteyi Crews, 2013: 455, figs 15-18 (♂♀, examined).
Diagnosis.
The female of Karaops forteyi is not similar to any species in the Pilbara by the epigyne. The endogyne is somewhat similar to that of K. feedtime . It has long, skinny, ducts with several turns. The spermathecae are very long, with either end being more oval than those in K. feedtime . The accessory bulbs are mislabeled as the spermathecae in Crews (2013). The accessory bulbs arise from the copulatory ducts and are long and narrow, similar to the spermathecae. Unlike the epigyne of K. feedtime , there is no median lobe but rather a circular area where the copulatory openings are located laterally. The posterior margin of the epigyne is also indented ( Crews 2013: figs 13-16).
In the male of Karaops forteyi , the dRTA is much longer than the vRTA, and there is no keel or ridge as in K. yurlburr or K. ngarluma . The conductor is similar to that of K. nyiyaparli , but in K. forteyi , the embolus follows the margin of the cymbium, whereas it is more toward the middle of the bulb in K. nyiyaparli .
Description.
The description of the male and female can be found in Crews (2013).
Distribution.
This species is known only from two localities separated by a couple of kilometers (Map 9A, B View Map 9 ).
Natural history.
This species was collected in the Chichester subregion which contains more species than all other subregions (Suppl. material 2: table S1).
Discussion.
Karaops forteyi is known from only two specimens, a male and a female, paired together because at the time of their description it was unknown that they occurred within or nearby the range of multiple other species, and they were obtained fairly close together in pitfalls at the same time. The pitfall traps were left for more than a year, so there is no information on when adults may be found, and the types are faded and missing setae (Fig. 73H, I View Figure 73 ). Collecting around the area for a few hours only produced K. nyiyaparli . This species is quite different from K. nyiyaparli , so there is no chance of it being a variant. Only two specimens were recovered in traps that were left for more than a year, so this species is thought to be quite rare.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Karaops forteyi Crews, 2013
Crews, Sarah C. 2023 |
Karaops forteyi
Crews 2013 |