Abyssophthalmus, Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2009 d

Klompmaker, Adiël A., Starzyk, Natalia, Fraaije, René H. B. & Schweigert, Günter, 2020, Systematics and convergent evolution of multiple reef-associated Jurassic and Cretaceous crabs (Decapoda, Brachyura), Palaeontologia Electronica (a 32) 23 (2), pp. 1-54 : 15

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/1045

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A934459-9088-4AAB-8CAA-53787046FA17

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF7AFE1F-1103-1C0F-FC91-DF6F5B07FB3C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Abyssophthalmus
status

 

Genus ABYSSOPHTHALMUS Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2009d View in CoL

Type species. Prosopon spinosum von Meyer, 1842 , by original designation.

Included species. Abyssophthalmus adinae Schweitzer, Feldmann, Lazăr, Schweigert, and Franţescu, 2018 View in CoL ; A. bellaii (Crônier and Boursicot, 2009) View in CoL , as? Nodoprosopon View in CoL ;? A. dzhafarberdensis (Ilyin, 2005) comb. nov., as Nodoprosopon View in CoL ; A. hebes (von Meyer, 1835) View in CoL , as Prosopon View in CoL ; A. mainense (Crônier and Boursicot, 2009) View in CoL , as? Nodoprosopon View in CoL ; A. mirus (Moericke, 1889) View in CoL , as Prosopon View in CoL ; A. schultzi Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2009a View in CoL ; A. spinosus (von Meyer, 1842) View in CoL , as Prosopon View in CoL ; A. stotzingensis (von Meyer, 1856) , as Prosopon View in CoL .

? Abyssophthalmus dzhafarberdensis (Ilyin, 2005) View in CoL comb. nov.

Figure 7 View FIGURE 7

2005 Nodoprosopon dzhafarberdensis Ilyin , p. 171, fig. 35C, pl. 7.3.

Description. See Ilyin (2005, p. 171-175).

Remarks. Nodoprosopon dzhafarberdensis Ilyin, 2005 , from the Tithonian-Berriasian of Crimea, was questionably assigned to Prosopon by Schweitzer and Feldmann (2009d), but a subsequent paper indicated that placement into a longodromitid genus such as Planoprosopon or Abyssophthalmus may be better (Schweitzer et al., 2018), to which we concur. Schweitzer and Feldmann (2009d, p. 101) proposed three differences between the two genera: Abyssophthalmus would be less dorso-ventrally compressed, exhibit deeper orbits, and possess stronger orbital ornamentation. Only the first difference can be used here because the depth of the orbits and ornamentation on the orbital rim are difficult to observe in N. dzhafarberdensis . Based on a higher resolution image than the one published in Ilyin (2005) ( Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 ), we tentatively ascribe the taxon to Abyssophthalmus because the dorsal surface does not appear to be very compressed. We did not use Ilyin’s figure 35C for comparison because this drawing does not appear to accurately represent the specimen.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF