Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E233F731-D5FA-4032-B3A4-CEFE5A809C49 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10494338 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF4E397F-FFD3-3166-9786-F8C5BF7D064A |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010 |
| status |
|
Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010
Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010: 106 .
This ‘genus’ was erected under the rules of the Phylocode, which does not recognize ranks or type species. The ‘definition’ of Depressiogeodia is quoted from the original paper: ‘(nomen cladi novum): (stem-based) the most inclusive clade containing Geodia barretti Bowerbank, 1858 View in CoL and not Geodia gibberosa Lamarck, 1815 View in CoL and Geodia cydonium ( Jameson, 1811) View in CoL ’. The ‘genus’ name is here considered unavailable, even though encompassing at least two named species, Geodia barretti View in CoL and G. hentscheli Cárdenas et al. 2010 . These species are to be reverted to genus Geodia View in CoL . Phylocode and Linnean classifications show fundamental differences. The WPD and WoRMS have committed themselves to the latter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010
| Van Soest, Rob W. M. 2024 |
Depressiogeodia Cárdenas, Rapp, Schander & Tendal, 2010: 106
| Cardenas, P. & Rapp, H. T. & Schander, C. & Tendal, O. S. 2010: 106 |