Perilampus aeneus (Rossius, 1790)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.96.83235 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:78AF5F05-21F1-41D7-A37B-1AAFFF77E441 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BD72D833-9659-5103-A4FD-1C6BA0CBE7A1 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Perilampus aeneus (Rossius, 1790) |
status |
|
Perilampus aeneus (Rossius, 1790) View in CoL View at ENA
Fig. 2 View Figure 2
Chalcis aenea Rossius, 1790 in Rossi (1790: 59).
Cynips italica Fabricius, 1793: 103. Synonymy by Steffan (1952: 73).
Diagnosis.
Head and mesosoma except propodeum dorsally bright bronze green, head sometimes bluish; propodeum and metasoma blue green; female flagellum black. Body size: 2.50-5.00 mm. Head shape in frontal view (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) much wider than high. Head in lateral view not unusually long, without distinct sulcus separating posterior eye margin from temple. Clypeal margin (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) truncate. Supraclypeal area (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) slightly transverse (less than 1.5 × as wide as high), sides not defined; in male without oval lateral impressions. Malar sulcus versus anterior margin of malar depression shorter in female, about equal in male. Frontal keels (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) well developed. Face between scrobes and eye (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) almost smooth. Face between clypeus and eye (Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) smooth. Lateral ocellus small (OOL at least twice the largest ocellar diameter). Funicular segments in female (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ): most segments quadrate to transverse. Male scape (Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ) slightly widened distally; ventral pores on about half scape length. Mesosoma (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ) not narrow (less than 1.4 × as long as wide). Mesoscutum sculpture (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ) without smooth median tubercle; interspaces smaller than punctures, smooth. Scutellum hind margin (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ) without a double carina, with large bilobed protruding projection. Prepectus (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ) wide, dorsal margin longer than pronotal collar; well defined anteriorly (i.e. suture with pronotum very distinct); all sides with punctures, leaving a large smooth central area.
Material examined.
Greece: 1♀, " Kerkini Lake N. Park , Promohonas , Procom site, Malaise, 23.V to 29.V.2007, 41°22'38.1"N, 23°21'58.8"E, Leg. Gordon Ramel" (MICO) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, " Kerkini Lake N. Park , Promohonas , Procom site, Malaise, 22-28.VIII.2007, 41°22'38.1"N, 23°21'58.8"E, Leg. Gordon Ramel" (MICO) GoogleMaps ; 1♀, " Kerkini lake ; Malaise trap; Krousia Mts. Site, 12.IX to 18.IX.2007, 41°11'32.4"N, 23°03'59.5"E, Leg. Gordon Ramel" (MICO) GoogleMaps ; 3♀♀, " Kerkini Lake N. Park , Kerkini , Krousia Mts site, Malaise tr., 13.VI-19.VI.2007, 41°11'32.4"N, 23°03'59.5" E, 190 m, Leg. Gordon Ramel" (MICO) GoogleMaps ; 1♂, " Rizari , nr. Edessa, 40.792366°N, 22.107232°E ", "OP cherry, M2 - P1-2, 3.05.2019, leg. F. Karamaouna " (MICO) GoogleMaps .
Romania: 1♀, "IS, Ciric-Izvor, 10.VIII.2006, leg. M.-D. Mitroiu " (MICO); 1♀, " Iași county, Valea lui David Natural Reserve, 02.viii.1998, sweep, M.-D. Mitroiu leg." (MICO); 1♀, " Brăila county, Smârdan, 30.viii.2005, herbaceous vegetation along canal, Popovici O. & Moglan I." (MICO); 1♀, 1♂, " Tulcea county, near Babadag, 15-17.v.2009, L. Fusu leg." (MICO); 1♂, " Constanța county, Gura Dobrogei Natural Reserve , 12.v.2007, L. Fusu leg." (MICO) . Turkey: 1♀, " Turkey: Kastamonu, Kastamonu area, 18.vii.1962, 1000 m ", "Guichard & Harvey, B.M. 1962-299", " ♀ Perilampus Perilampus (Rossius), Z. Bouček det. 1972" (NHMUK); 1♂, " Turkey: Amasya, Alt. I. 400 Ft", " 6.6.1959, K.M. Guichard ", " ♂ Perilampus Perilampus (Rossius), Z. Bouček det. 1972" (NHMUK) .
Hosts.
Associated with Curculionidae ( Coleoptera ), Tenthredinidae ( Hymenoptera ), and Tortricidae ( Lepidoptera ); presumably a hyperparasitoid.
Distribution.
Bosnia Herzegovina, Croatia, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Moldova, Netherlands, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom. New species to Greece and Romania.
Comments.
Perilampus aeneus is somewhat similar to P. eximius and P. ruficornis due to its bright colour and presence of frontal keels. From both species it can be separated by the sculpture of the prepectus, which has a complete (although sometimes shallow) row of punctures near its anterior margin (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ), and the bigger ocelli (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ). Furthermore, the female of P. aeneus can be separated from the females of the previously mentioned species by the colour of the flagellum, which is black and not reddish (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Perilampus aeneus (Rossius, 1790)
Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan & Koutsoukos, Evangelos 2023 |
Cynips italica
Fabricius 1793 |