Eratigena balearica, (BRIGNOLI, 1978)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12040 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28796C66-FD49-4FA9-8D0F-21DD495AA88A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6983308 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BD701413-E21B-B665-54C0-FC0FC38216AE |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Eratigena balearica |
status |
|
ERATIGENA BALEARICA (BRIGNOLI, 1978) View in CoL COMB. NOV.
( FIG. 13A–B, I–J View Figure 13 )
Malthonica balearica Brignoli, 1978a: 278 , 279, fig. 8, female; Barrientos & Febrer, 1986: 123–128, figs 1–3.
Types
Holotype: Spain: Balearic Islands: Majorca, Porto Cristo , ‘près de Cueva del Drach’, ♀ ( MHNG), 1.iv.1968, Hauser.
Paratype. Spain: Balearic Islands: Majorca, ‘sur route de Palma-Valldemosa’ , ♀ ( MHNG), 4.iv.1968, Hauser .
Other material examined
Spain (3 ♂, 3 ♀)
Diagnosis
See Diagnosis section of E. picta . For illustrations see Barrientos & Febrer (1986).
Description
Measurements: Measurements of males were provided by Barrientos & Febrer (1986). Female (N = 1): CL 2.1, CW 1.4, STL 1.2, STW 1.0. Leg I (2.1, 0.7, 2.0, 1.7, 1.2), II (1.75, 0.7, 1.5, 1.4, 1.0), III (1.7, 0.6, -, -, -), IV (2.2, 0.8, 2.1, 2.0, 1.1). Pedipalp (0.85, 0.3, 0.55, 0.8). Eyes: PME 0.095, PLE 0.124, AME 0.105, ALE 0.114. Eye distances: PME- PME 1–1.5 x PME, PME- AME 1–1.5 x PME, PME- PLE 1 x PME, PME- ALE 1.5 x PME, AME–AME 0.5–1 x AME, AME- ALE <0.5– 0.5 x AME. CLY1 1.5–2 x AME, CLY2 0.5–1 x ALE.
Male palp: RTA with two branches, lateral branch broad, flattened, and distally truncated, dorsal branch broad, elongated, and bent posteriad. Short dorsal spike on male palp tibia present (arrow in Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ). Embolus length about 1.5–1.75 x CB, originating at 8 o’clock position, distal tip at 2–4 o’clock position. Conductor long oval, distal portion moderately elongated, as long as wide, lateral margin almost completely folded. Terminal end complex, strongly sclerotized, and with two spirally twisted points. Transversal ridge of conductor expressed as membranous lamella. Conductor membranously connected to tegulum. MA originating at 5 o’clock position, wider than long, distally with pocket-like sclerite. Connection of MA to tegulum at least partly strongly sclerotized.
Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with distinct, oval atrial cavity, posteriorly limited by narrow margin. Epigynal teeth absent. Anteriorly, CD are visible through epigynal plate. Vulva consists of distinguishable CD, RC, and FD. CD convoluted, ending in irregularly sclerotized, thickened, tube-like RC, separated by about 1.5 x their diameter. FD only represented by small, leaf-shaped appendages.
Other important characters: Cheliceral retromargin with eight to nine teeth. Colulus rectangularly shaped with distal margin w-shaped. Distal segment of PLS longer than basal segment. PMS with one prominent minor ampullate gland spigot and two cylindrical gland spigots on both lateral sides. Tarsal trichobothria on cymbium and palp tarsus absent. Tarsal trichobothria five to six. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 16. Leg spination: female palp (2–0–0, 2–0–0, 2–2–0, several), male palp (2–0–0, 2–0–0, 1–2–0, several), leg femora (2–2–0–0, 2–1–0–0 or 2–1–1–0 or 2–2–1–0, 2–1–1–0, 1–1–1–0 or 2–1–1–0), patellae (all 2–0–0), tibiae (0–0–0–2+1p or 0–0–0–2p or 0–0–0–4, 0–1–0–1+1p or 2–1–0–1+1p, 2–2–1–1+1p or 2–2–2– 1+1p or 2–2–2–1+1p+1, 2–2–2–2+1p+1 or 2–2–2–3), metatarsi (0–0–0–3p+1, 0–2–0–3p+1 or 0–3–0–3p+1, 1–3–3–4p+1 or 1–4–3–1p+1+2p+1, 1–4–4–1p+1+2p+1 or 1–4–4–3p+1), tarsi (I and II 0, 0–1–2–0, 0–1–1–0 or 0–1–2–0).
Coloration: Carapace with two symmetrical longitudinal dark bands. Sternum with distinct pale median region. Opisthosoma brownish to dark brownish, anteriorly with three bands, yellowish, posteriorly continuing in chevrons. Legs weakly but continuously darkened. ALS and both segments of PLS darkened.
Distribution
Reported from the Balearic Islands. Discussion
Barrientos & Febrer (1986) suggested that this species is closely related to E. picta . The generic assignment of this species was controversial until the restricted definition of Malthonica by Barrientos & Cardoso (2007). Their hypothesis, that E. balearica does not belong to Malthonica and that it is closely related to E. picta , is fully supported here.
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eratigena balearica
Bolzern, Angelo, Burckhardt, Daniel & Hänggi, Ambros 2013 |
Malthonica balearica
Barrientos JA & Febrer JB 1986: 123 |
Brignoli PM 1978: 278 |