Eratigena vomeroi Bolzern, Angelo, Burckhardt, Daniel & Hänggi, Ambros, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12040 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28796C66-FD49-4FA9-8D0F-21DD495AA88A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6983331 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BD701413-E20F-B670-5482-FD54C5EE1467 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Eratigena vomeroi |
status |
comb. nov. |
ERATIGENA VOMEROI (BRIGNOLI, 1977) View in CoL COMB. NOV.
( FIGS 13E–F, M–Q View Figure 13 , 14C–D, G–H View Figure 14 )
Tegenaria inermis: Brignoli, 1971a: 88–89 , figs 32–38, misidentified.
Tegenaria vomeroi Brignoli, 1977a: 50–51 , figs 31–33.
Malthonica vomeroi: Guseinov et al., 2005: 164 .
Types
Holotype. Italy: Basilicata: Potenza, Lagonegro, ‘ Grotta del Cervaro’ , ♂ ( MCSN, 541), 9.xii.1966, Sbordoni.
Paratypes. Italy: same data as holotype, 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Potenza, Tramutola, Risorgenza dell’Aquila , 3 ♂, 1 ♀ (prope inermis, MHNG, epigyne missing in the tube, 1 ♂ MNHN, 1971 ), 21.xi.1970, Vomero ; same location as previous, 1 ♂ ( MCSN, 541), 9.iv.1970, Sbordoni .
Other material examined
Italy (4 ♀) .
Diagnosis
See Diagnosis section for E. inermis .
Description
Measurements: Male (N = 1): CL 5.59, CW 3.97, STL 2.58, STW 2.47, OL 6.0, OW 3.6. Leg I (10.20, 2.23, 10.00, 11.00, 4.60), II (8.63, 2.15, 7.28, 10.10, -), III (6.98, 1.88, 6.15, 9.50, 3.58), IV (9.90, 1.92, 7.88, 12.60, 4.31). Pedipalp (2.55, 0.86, 1.12, 2.64), bulbL 1.06. Female (N = 2): CL 5.85–6.56, CW 4.04–4.42, STL 2.56–2.95, STW 2.38–2.73, OL 7.50, OW 3.98. Leg I (7.55–9.00, 2.22–2.30, 7.15–7.88, 7.67–8.55, 3.14–4.00), II (6.89–7.50, 2.07–2.30, 5.97–6.75, 7.19– 7.95, 3.16–3.75), III (6.41–7.28, 1.87–2.12, 5.28–6.00, 6.83–7.88, 2.96–3.27), IV (8.26–8.78, 1.91–2.30, 6.67– 7.65, 9.75–11.50, 2.82–4.20). Pedipalp (2.68–2.92, 1.00–1.07, 1.79–1.86, 2.81–3.09). EPL 0.80, EPW 1.26, ATL 0.65, ATW 0.80. Eyes: PME 0.23–0.26, PLE 0.25–
0.27, AME 0.21–0.24, ALE 0.25–0.32. Eye distances: PME–PME 1 x PME, PME–AME 0.5–1 x PME, PME– PLE 0.5–1 x PME, PME–ALE 1–1.5 x PME, AME– AME 0.5–1 x AME, AME–ALE ≤ 0.5 x AME, CLY1 2.5–3 x AME, CLY2 1.5–2 x ALE.
Male palp: As in E. inermis except for a less sclerotized basal part of the median apophysis and the massive transversal ridge of conductor with indistinct margin between membranous and more sclerotized areas.
Epigyne and vulva: As in E. inermis except for the long appendages anteriorly of the CD reaching at least to the top of the RC (or even beyond; Fig. 14G, H View Figure 14 ). As the appearance of the epigyne and vulva seems to be quite variable, no other distinct differences between the two species could be found.
Other important characters and coloration: As in E. inermis except for spination on male and female palp femora 2–1–1–0.
Distribution
Reported from central to southern Italy.
MCSN |
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Verona |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eratigena vomeroi
Bolzern, Angelo, Burckhardt, Daniel & Hänggi, Ambros 2013 |
Malthonica vomeroi:
Guseinov EF & Marusik YM & Koponen S 2005: 164 |
Tegenaria vomeroi
Brignoli PM 1977: 51 |
Tegenaria inermis:
Brignoli PM 1971: 89 |