Inga vivo
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.phytochem.2022.113183 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC47F915-FFEB-1333-DA01-F96C65EEED44 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Inga vivo |
status |
|
4.7. In vivo Plasmopara viticola assay
Plant pathogen bioassays were performed on grapevine seedlings cv. “Chasselas” grown in the greenhouse as described before ( Thuerig et al., 2016). In short, plants were treated with the product when they had 3-4 fully grown leaves. Leaves were left to dry before inoculation with P. viticola (50 ′ 000 sp/mL). After inoculation, plants were kept at 80–99% relative humidity (RH) (20–21 ◦ C) for 1 d. Then, plants were grown at 60–80% RH and 20 ◦ C for 5 d, before increasing humidity again to 80–99% RH to induce sporulation for disease assessment. The percentage area covered by sporulating lesions (disease severity) was visually assessed for each leaf and a mean calculated for each plant. Each experiment included a non-treated control and a copper reference (copper hydroxide, Kocide® Opti, DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA) at a standard concentration (0.3 mg /mL copper ions) as used in practice. Dried I. sapindoides extracts were either dissolved in DMSO at 100 mg /mL (small scale EtOH extract), or formulated as a wettable powder to improve solubility and applicability [20% extract (Herbamed extract), 20% solvent, 51% carrier, 6% defoaming agent, 3% surfactant] before adding to water to give extract concentrations of 1, 0.5, and 0.25 mg /mL Each treatment consisted of six replicate plants. Percentage efficacy of the test products was calculated as (1-(mean disease severity in plants treated with product/mean disease severity in non-treated control))*100 for each test product.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |