Macropelopia quadrimacula Xu & Fu, 2024

Fang, Xiangliang, Xu, Zigang, Yao, Yuanyuan & Fu, Yue, 2024, Two new species of Macropelopia (Diptera, Chironomidae) from Oriental China, delineated with morphology and COI sequences, ZooKeys 1210, pp. 287-298 : 287-298

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1210.127183

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D0A3DB9-3CD4-4DD5-97DA-471BCF3FAD8A

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13380425

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/13C57663-77BF-4852-988D-F05C38B51B33

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:13C57663-77BF-4852-988D-F05C38B51B33

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Macropelopia quadrimacula Xu & Fu
status

sp. nov.

Macropelopia quadrimacula Xu & Fu sp. nov.

Fig. 2 A – K View Figure 2

Type material.

Holotype, male ( HNU: Cdbs 7602 ), China: Hubei Province, Huanggang City, Yingshan County, Dabie Mountain , Longtan Gorge , 31.0867 ° N, 115.8138 ° E, 486.71 m a. s. l., 8. VI. 2022, light trap, leg. Zigang Xu GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 3 males ( HNU: Cdbs 7601 , Cdbs 7603 , Cdbs 7604 ), same as holotype GoogleMaps ; 3 males ( HNU: Cdbs 8901 , Cdbs 8902 , Cdbs 8903 ), Hubei Province, Huanggang City, Yingshan County, Dabie Mountain , Wujiashan National Forest Park , 31.1047 ° N, 115.7913 ° E, 931.91 m a. s. l., 9. VI. 2022, light trap, leg. Zigang Xu GoogleMaps .

Etymology.

The name of this new species is derived from the Latin words “ quartri ” and “ macula ”, meaning “ four ” and “ spot ”, “ stain ” or “ mark ”, respectively. The name specifically pertains to the presence of four distinctive black spots found on the tergites of this species.

Diagnostic characters.

This species has two short longitudinal striped spots on each side of tergites II to V, as well as two elliptical spots in the center. Wing with brown markings on apical of Cu 1, M 3 + 4 and basal part of cell an. Additionally, tergite IX with a triangular anal point beyond the margin of tergite IX. Lastly, the gonostylus is curved inward at two-thirds of its length, and the apex is markedly tapered.

Description.

Adult males (N = 7)

Total length: 4.49–5.55, 5.02 mm, Wing length 2.72–3.27, 2.99 mm, TL / WL 1.65–1.76, 1.71, WL / Pfe 2.08–2.59, 2.34.

Coloration (Fig. 2 D View Figure 2 ). The head and thorax of this species are uniformly brown. The femurs of all legs are also brown, while the other sections display a yellow coloration. The wings are adorned with various color spots. Notably, there is a longitudinal color band on both sides of tergites II to V, accompanied by two elliptical spots at the center. Tergites VI to VII exhibit a dark brown hue, while tergites VIII to IX and the hypopygium are brown in color.

Head (Fig. 2 A View Figure 2 ). Antenna with 13 flagellomeres (Fig. 2 B View Figure 2 ), AR: 2.01–2.05, 2.03, The end of flagellomere narrow, with approximately one-third of the end easily foldable, and the ultimate flagellomere possessing a single apical seta. Temporal setae 20–22, 21. The inner verticals and outer verticals are arranged in two or three columns, with 4–8, 6 inner verticals, 10–16, 13 outer verticals, and 12–18, 15 postorbitals. Tentorial length 250–258, 254 µm, width 36–43, 40 µm. Stipes length 271–303, 287 µm, width 62–95, 78 µm. Clypeus with 16–18, 17 setae. Length of palpomeres (in µm): 67–78, 72; 91–105, 98; 173–190, 182; 241–279, 260; 334–378, 356. Length ratio of palpomeres 5 / 3: 1.93–1.99, 1.96.

Thorax (Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 ). Thorax length 1.36–1.73, 1.55 mm, antepronotals with 12–12, 12 setae. The acrostichals and dorsocentrals are arranged in multiple columns, acrostichals with 40–60, 50 setae, dorsocentrals with 60–80, 70 setae. Anepisternals with 2–3, 3 setae, postnotals with 4–6, 5 setae, humerals with 8–14, 11 setae, prealars with 22–26, 24 setae. Scutal tubercle was present and obvious, scutellars with 32–40, 36 setae.

Wing (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ). The wing membrane area is hairy, Cu 1 and An with obvious gray spots around the veins, arculus hook-shaped, and anal lobes particularly developed. VR: 0.91–0.96, 0.94, brachiolum with 3 setae, R 1 with 30–40, 35 setae, R with 40–60, 50 setae, R 4 + 5 with 50–60, 55 setae, squama with 54–60, 57 setae. Costal extension 157–160, 158 µm.

Legs. The fore tibia possesses a single spur measuring 85–112, 98 µm in length and features 19–20, 20 side teeth. The width of the fore tibia at its apex is 79–86, 82 µm, and fore tibial comb consists of 5–6 setae (Fig. 2 G View Figure 2 ). Two spurs on mid tibia are observed, measuring 87–95, 91 µm and 50–56, 53 µm long, bearing 18–20, 19 and 11–16, 14 lateral teeth, respectively, and has a width at the apex of 75–81, 78 µm. The hind tibia exhibits two spurs, measuring 88–96, 92 µm and 49–53, 51 µm, with 19–21, 20 and 15–17, 16 lateral teeth, respectively. The hind tibial comb is composed of 13–15, 14 setae, with the longest comb seta 73–81, 77 µm and the shortest 40 – 46, 43 µm. The width of the hind tibia at its apex is recorded as 76–86, 81 µm. The lengths and proportions of each leg are shown in Table 2 View Table 2 .

Hypopygium (Fig. 2 H – K View Figure 2 ). The anal point is small, forming an obtuse triangle. Phallapodeme short and obvious, 72–81, 77 µm long. Gonocoxite cylindrical shape, 253–265, 259 µm long. Gonostylus (Fig. 2 K View Figure 2 ) 126–146, 136 µm long, curved inward at two-thirds of its length and possessing protrusions both on the inner and outer sides, the inner protrusion was located at a quarter of the apex of the gonostylus, while the outer protrusion was located halfway along the apex. Tergite IX with 16–20, 18 setae, megaseta 16–17 µm long. Inferior volsella small and protuberant. HR: 1.91–2.09, 2.00. HV: 3.56–3.94, 3.75.

Remarks.

This new species can be identified by the presence of two short longitudinal color bands on the sides of tergites II to V, along with two elliptical spots in the middle. These distinctive characteristics set it apart from other species within the genus. However, the abdominal spots of this species may sometimes be indistinct and appear blurry. In tergites III to V, these spots may be partially obscured by brown spots, but tergite II consistently displays four clearly visible elliptical spots. The overall shape of this new species is similar to that of M. kibunensis , and it shares the same gonostylus morphology. However, M. kibunensis lacks an inferior volsella and anal point, while this new species possesses a protrusion on the inferior volsella. The shape of the inferior volsella is comparable to that of M. excavata sp. nov., but this new species can still be differentiated by the presence of color spots on the tergites, the presence of the anal point, and a higher HR value (1.91–2.09) compared to M. excavata sp. nov. Based on COI sequences, the pairwise distances between M. quadrimacula and M. kibunensis , and between M. quadrimacula and M. excavata , are 0.119 –0.125 and 0.131, respectively, further setting it apart from them.

Distribution.

Hubei Province, Oriental China.

HNU

Hunan Normal University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Chironomidae

Genus

Macropelopia