Attaphila schuppi Bolivar , 1905
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.79.e67569 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5BE5330D-71CA-4F12-BB2E-C7B29A5C33B2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BA4D3E16-229A-56FA-8322-212D7AC846F6 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Attaphila schuppi Bolivar , 1905 |
status |
|
4.7. Attaphila schuppi Bolivar, 1905
Figs 11A, B View Figure 11 , 12F View Figure 12 , 14F View Figure 14 , 16G, H View Figure 16 , 18J, K View Figure 18 , 20C, D View Figure 20 , 22J View Figure 22
Attaphila schuppi Bolívar, 1905: 138; Princis 1963: 111.
Material studied.
Type material. Syntypes, 2♀, [ Brazil, Estado Rio Grande do Sul], Porto Alegre, acc. by Atta nigra Schupp (each on two slides: Bo 1234 [labelled "Lectoholotype, det. A.B.Gurney, 1971"] and Bo 1237) (M. Maastricht) .
Diagnosis.
Female Characterised by a series of unique features: Transversal ridge of T2-5 mesally and laterally with a small but distinct anterior excurvation (much weaker present also in A. multisetosa ), transversal ridge absent on T7, cerci longer than wide.
Description.
Size Length of body (dried): female 3.5 mm. Surface bristles of tergites 2-5 approximately arranged in two transversal rows (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). Transversal ridges tr2-5 medially and sublaterally with a small but distinct excurvation to the anterior (grey arrows in Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ; much stronger than in A. multisetosa , Fig. 10A View Figure 10 ).
Male Unknown.
Female Tergites 6,7: (Figs 11B View Figure 11 , 12F View Figure 12 , 14F View Figure 14 ) Median lobe of T7 short, but distinct; transversal ridge tr6 well developed, tr7 missing except for few short remnants including also the two tr7 -associated bristles, tr6 sublaterally with a weak, but distinct angular bend; surface bristles numerous on T6, small to very small, focused to wider central part of surface area; absent on T7. Subgenital plate (Figs 16G, H View Figure 16 , 18J, K View Figure 18 ) rounded-rectangular, with parallel lateral borders; posterior border rather weakly trilobed; lateral parts of transversal ridge (sr7-l) fairly straight, ridge mesally ending before having reached a transversal orientation (near anterior border of S7, and hardly curved mesad), with a very wide median gap. Genitalia: (Figs 20C, D View Figure 20 , 22J View Figure 22 ) Spermathecal plate sp likely small (not clearly identifiable), pouch gcp likely absent (Fig. 20C, D View Figure 20 ). In laterosternal shelf sclerite (Fig. 22J View Figure 22 ) central part (c) moderately long and posteriorly transversally cut, arms (a) fairly wide, wing parts (w) fairly wide, their base reaching far into anterior half of tubes; tubes (lst) straight, of fairly uniform width throughout, anterior end widely rounded. Mesal gonangulum sclerites (gg-m) distinct, lateral ones absent (Fig. 20D View Figure 20 ).
Host species.
Acromyrmex niger (F. Smith, 1858) (as " Atta nigra Schupp" in Bolívar 1905; originally placed in Atta , since 1913 attributed to Acromyrmex , and placed deeply in Acromyrmex according to Cristiano et al. 2020).
Distribution.
Brazil: Est. Rio Grande do Sul, only known from the type locality Porto Allegre.
Remarks.
The Wasmann Collection in Maastricht keeps two female specimens (on one pin) labelled by Wasmann as follows: " Attaphila schuppi (m) Boliv., Typen"; there are no labels concerning locality and species of the ant host. Bolívar’s description contains, after a short morphological characterisation, the following data: "♂ Long. 3,5 mill. Hab. Porto Alegre. Elle se trouve en compagnie de Atta nigra Schupp. ...". The discrepancy between the two data sets raises the question whether the females from Maastricht had really been the subjects of Bolívar’s description.
The absence of a number ahead of the sex symbol does not necessarily mean that Bolívar had only one specimen for study; in the descriptions of some other new species in the same paper Bolívar never noted the number of treated specimens. The strongest doubts in considering the Maastricht specimens as type specimens of A. schuppi concern the sex determination. It is extremely unlikely that Bolívar should have confused the two sexes. In the description of A. aptera in the same paper Bolívar emphasises the exceptional case of that species having wingless males (a wrong assumption, as a larval male is concerned, see 4.1.). On the other hand, it appears unlikely that Bolívar had males in his hands when he described the species A. schuppi. The description does not contain any remarks concerning wings, and the posterior border of the last sternite is described as being "transverso trisinuato", as is typical for the subgenital plate of Attaphila females. The simplest solution for the conflicting pieces of information would be to assume an error in the printing of the sex symbol.
The last remaining issue is the incomplete labelling of the type specimens. Wasmann had got the specimens from R.P. Schupp, possibly already without a label and only with a verbal information about the collecting data, which he might have passed on to Bolívar. After getting back the specimens he might have forgotten to label them accordingly. In spite of the dubious circumstances, the authors are convinced that the Maastricht specimens represent the type specimens of A. schuppi .
A.B. Gurney had labelled one of the specimens as lectotype: "Top specimen (mature ♀) designated lectoholotype Attaphila schuppi . det. A.B.Gurney 1971". In fact, both specimens are mature females, and since the designation was not published, it is ignored.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Attaphila schuppi Bolivar , 1905
Bohn, Horst, Nehring, Volker, G., Jonathan Rodriguez & Klass, Klaus-Dieter 2021 |
Attaphila schuppi
Bolivar 1905 |