Chromagallia Linnavuori, 1954
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181693 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229519 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BA2287DF-C22F-A349-FF2E-02A8FA47FAA2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chromagallia Linnavuori, 1954 |
status |
|
Key to males of Chromagallia Linnavuori, 1954 View in CoL
1. Forewings with yellow markings.................................................................................................................2
- Forewings with red markings or without markings.....................................................................................4
2. Anterior dorsum entirely black or dark brown .............. C. zanolae View in CoL sp. nov. ( Brazil, Paraná State) (in part)
- Anterior dorsum with yellow markings ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 , 49 View FIGURES 49 – 56 )...............................................................................3
3. Aedeagal apex ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ) directed dorsally, its contour not continuing profile of shaft; processes on abdominal segment X poorly developed ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ) ............... C. flavofasciata ( Stål, 1854) View in CoL ( Brazil, unknown state)
- Adeagal apex directed posteriorly, its contour continuing profile of shaft ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 35 – 40. C ); processes on abdominal segment X well developed ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 35 – 40. C ) ....................... C. longistilata View in CoL ( Coelho & Dutra, 1992) comb. nov. ( Brazil, Rio de Janeiro and Paraná States)
4. Crown black with red markings ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ).................................................................................................5
- Crown entirely black ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ).....................................................................................................................7
5. Subgenital plates with less sclerotized, narrow median area on basal portion ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 17. C ); aedeagal apex slightly spiralized ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 14 – 17. C ); membrane IX–X with poorly developed processes ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14 – 17. C ) .......................... ............................................................................................. C. carvalhoi View in CoL sp. nov. ( Brazil, São Paulo State)
- Subgenital plates without less sclerotized area on basal portion or, if present, then broader and shorter than above ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23 – 29. C ); aedeagal apex not as above; membrane IX–X with well developed processes ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 7 – 13. C , 23, 28 View FIGURES 23 – 29. C )..........................................................................................................................................................6
6. Membrane IX–X with well developed processes directed posteriorly ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 7 – 13. C ) ........................................ .......................................................................................... C. lamasi View in CoL sp. nov. ( Brazil, Rio de Janeiro State)
- Membrane IX–X with processes directed inward ( Figs 23, 28 View FIGURES 23 – 29. C ).................................................................... .................................................................................... C. lanceolata View in CoL sp. nov. ( Brazil, Rio de Janeiro State)
7. Pygofer with posterodorsal margin acute or subacute ( Figs 30 View FIGURES 30 – 34. C , 54 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ); subgenital plates greatly narrowed ( Figs 31 View FIGURES 30 – 34. C , 55 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ).................................................................................................................................................8
- Pygofer with posterodorsal margin rounded ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 22. C ); subgenital plates not greatly narrowed ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 22. C ) .... ....................................................................................... C. zanolae View in CoL sp. nov. ( Brazil, Paraná State) (in part)
8. Pygofer with acute posterodorsal margin ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ); styles small with obsolete fork ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ) ..................... .................................................................................... C. saucia ( Stål, 1862) View in CoL ( Brazil, Rio de Janeiro State)
- Pygofer with subacute posterodorsal margin ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 30 – 34. C ); styles very long and narrow, without fork ( Figs 32, 33 View FIGURES 30 – 34. C ) ............................................................... C. paraguayensis View in CoL sp. nov. ( Paraguay, Canindeyú Department)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |