Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola)
publication ID |
4580 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285062 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B99DB0F1-D926-8273-A3FC-A65E5FD653C2 |
treatment provided by |
Christiana |
scientific name |
Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola) |
status |
|
16. Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola) View in CoL HNS
Cyphomyrmex rimosus HNS , presently taken as a polytypical species, is both the commonest form in the genus and at the same time a residue of classification. The puzzling variability of the complex, which gave rise to a number of infraspecific names in the past, needs a special study, not possible at this time.
Yet I must point out that the infraspecific arrangement for rimosus HNS , as proposed at the beginning of this paper, does not imply a judgement upon the validity of the actually recognized 11 morphs and 6 synonyms. It only serves the purpose of keeping track of these names.
The separation of hamulatus HNS , salvini HNS and transversus HNS as full species, and the return of cochunae HNS and venezuelensis HNS to the rimosus HNS complex are novelties. The former step, i. e. the raising of the three "races" to specific category seems to be justified by morphological and distributional considerations; cochunae HNS , elevated to species level by Kusnezov (1957) does not deserve this rank being probably just a synonym of one of the previously described morphs of rimosus HNS ; venezuelensis HNS did not prove a synonym of transversus HNS , as proposed by Weber (1958), and was put back under rimosus HNS awaiting clarification of its true status.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |