Camponotus lateralis var. ebneri Finzi 1930
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25674/so |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10870890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B91787A1-F43F-296C-D600-F9B3FD88FDEA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Camponotus lateralis var. ebneri Finzi 1930 |
status |
|
Camponotus lateralis var. ebneri Finzi 1930
The only specimen available was the type worker from Lebanon, stored in NHM Wien and labeled ‘Beskinta – Sannin, Liban. 16.VIII.’28. R. Ebner Mus. Caes. Vind.’, ‘ Type! Camponotus lateralis var. ebneri n. v. det. Finzi 1929’, ‘ANTWEB CASENT0915596’.
Diagnosis ( Tab. 2 View Table 2 ). The main difference to C. dalmaticus seems to be the much larger width of the dorsal propodeal plane.
Biology. unknown.
Comments. All forms of exploratory data analyses allocated the C.ebneri type specimen to the C. dalmaticus cluster and this was confirmed by a wild-card run in a 3-class LDA with posterior probabilities of p = 0.969 for C. dalmaticus , 0.006 for C. candiotes and 0.025 for C. piceus . However, PrW/CS 1.25 and MGr/CS 1.25 of the C. ebneri type are above the upper extremes of C. dalmaticus ( Tab. 3 View Table 3 ) and there is apparently a big gap between the Balkan range of C. dalmaticus and the Lebanon site of C. ebneri . For these reasons C. ebneri is not synonymized here and assumed to be an allopatric sister species of C. dalmaticus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |