Camponotus guanchus Santschi 1908
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25674/so |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10870814 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B91787A1-F437-297B-D600-FD99FC0FFB7D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Camponotus guanchus Santschi 1908 |
status |
|
Camponotus guanchus Santschi 1908 View in CoL
Investigated was 1 type worker labeled ‘Type’, ‘Tenerife Valle Gimenes 10. IX. 1899.’, ‘ C. lateralis Ol guancha Sant’ and 1 type gyne labeled ‘Type’, ‘Tenerife Bajan..do 23: III: 1902’, ‘ C. lateralis guancha Sant’; both stored in NHM Basel. This species from the Canaries differs from all Eurocaucasian species shown in Tab. 2 View Table 2 and Tab. 3 View Table 3 by propodeal and petiolar shape. The dorsal surface of propodeum is clearly convex in transverse section. In lateral aspect, dorsum and caudal slope of propodeum form an angle of about 130°and the transition is rounded – i.e., there is no indication of a dorsocaudal protrusion or of an abrupt transition from dorsal plane to slope. The petiolar node is narrow (PeW/CS 1.25 0.322) but thick in lateral view – corresponding to the situation in Lasius fuliginosus (Latreille 1798) . These characters may possibly indicate a close relatedness to the North African taxa C. sicheli rubra Karavajev 1912 and C. sicheli nigra Karavajev 1912 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |