Meganola leucosigna Hacker, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D310B8C8-A16F-4B55-B6E6-8FD5EC35DE63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4410697 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B804878C-FFDF-A41F-FF69-3DCE2B10FEBE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meganola leucosigna Hacker, 2012 |
status |
|
Meganola leucosigna Hacker, 2012
( Figs 46–47 View FIGURES 41–56 , 84 View FIGURES 84–87 , 104)
Meganola leucosigna Hacker, 2012 , Esperiana 17: 298. Type locality: Uganda, Fort Portal. Holotype, ♂ (ZSM).
Material examined. Ivory Coast. 3 ♂, 1 ♀, 1171 m, Mt Tonkoui Peak , N07°27’15,2”, W07°38’12,5”, 1–8.XI.2015, Light Trap, leg. Aristophanous, M., Moretto, P. & Ruzzier, E., ANHRT:2017.16, slide Nos: LGNA 46 ♂, LGNA 263 ♂, LGNA 264 ♀. Tanzania. 1 ♀, 1137 m, Sali Forest , Mahenge Mts., S 08°56’99.7”, E36°40’24.8”, 25–27.IV.2011, Light Trap, leg. Smith, R. & Takano , H., ANHRT:2017.3, slide No.: LGNA 124 ♀ ( ANHRT) .
Remark. M. leucosigna is the second member of the M. leucographa ( Fletcher, 1958) species-group sensu Hacker ( Hacker et al. 2012). The nominate taxon of the species-group was illustrated in Hacker et al. (2012) showing the male holotype and three female specimens along with their genitalia identified as M. leucographa , including a paratype. Hacker considered the two species superficially identical, although the male genitalia are strikingly different ( Hacker et al. 2012). Moreover, he suggested that the female paratype of M. leucographa was probably misidentified by Fletcher. In fact, the three female specimens (including the paratype) figured as M. leucographa are actually M. leucosigna . The only true M. leucographa is the male holotype, which displays considerably different wing pattern, especially the white postmedial line which is arched inwards in the ventral half of the forewing in M. leucographa , whereas it is conspicuously arcuate outwards in its whole length in M. leucosigna . It is worth noting, that M. leucographa seems to be nearly identical both in habitus and male genitalia with M. stenochra Hacker, 2012 described from Kivu Province, D.R. Congo. The latter species is possibly conspecific with M. leucographa , however confirmation of their synonymy requires further studies.
Distribution. Uganda, Burkina Faso Kenya, Cameroon, Ghana ( Hacker et al. 2012) and Tanzania ( Hacker 2014). Specimens from Ivory Coast represent new distribution data for the species.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Meganola leucosigna Hacker, 2012
László, Gyula M. 2020 |
Meganola leucosigna
Hacker 2012 |