Meganola foviferoides ( Poole, 1989 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D310B8C8-A16F-4B55-B6E6-8FD5EC35DE63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4498857 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B804878C-FFDE-A410-FF69-3DC92DA5FA8E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meganola foviferoides ( Poole, 1989 ) |
status |
|
Meganola foviferoides ( Poole, 1989)
( Figs 44–45 View FIGURES 41–56 , 82–83 View FIGURES 75–83 , 103 View FIGURES 96–103 )
Nola foviferoides Poole, 1989 , Lepidopterorum Catalogus 118, Noctuidae View in CoL : Part II: 695. Type locality: [ Zambia] N.E. Rhodesia, Fort Jameson. Holotype, ♂ (NHMUK).
Nola fovifera Hampson, 1911 View in CoL , Annals and Magazine of Natural History (8)8: 397. Nom. praeocc., junior secondary homonym of Celama fovifera Hampson, 1903 .
= Meganola longisigna Hacker, 2012 , Esperiana 17: 418, syn. n.
= Meganola politzari Hacker, 2012 , Esperiana 17: 511, syn. n.
Type material examined. Holotype. ♂, red ring type label, “N.E. Rhodesia, Ft. Jameson, to Lundazi , 4,000 ft. 9.VI.1910. S.A. Neave, 1910-406.”, with handwritten: “ Nola fovifera type ♂. Hmpsn.”, NHMUK 010598825 About NHMUK , Arctiidae gen. slide No. 536 ( NHMUK).
Additional material examined. Togo. 2 ♂, 415m, Fazao-Malfakassa NP, Point de vue campsite ( Sudanian GoogleMaps savannah), 8°48’50”N, 0°49’3.2”E, 16–23.viii.2018, Actinic Light Trap, Aristophanous, M., Geiser, M., Moretto, P., Sanbena, B. leg., ANHRT:2018.31, slide Nos.: LGNA 597 ♂, LGNA 598 ♂. Cameroon. Long series of both sexes, 900m, North Region, Wack ( La Falaise GoogleMaps ), 07°40’16.5”N, 13°33’18.4”E, 2–21.x.2018, Cold Cathode UV Light Trap, Sáfián, Sz., Simonics, G. leg., ANHRT:2018.36, slide Nos : LGNA 578 , LGNA 579 , LGNA 855 (all ♀) ( ANHRT). Zambia. 1 ♂, 1030m, Kundabwika Falls , Kalungwishi River, S 09°13’00”, E29°18’17”, 5–7. V.2013, Light Trap, leg. Smith, Takano & Oram, ANHRT:2017.9, slide No.: LGNA 32 ♂; 1 ♀, 1191 m, Kasanka River Pontoon, Kasanka N.P. S12°34’23”, E30°14’05”, 2–4.XII.2012, Light Trap, leg. Smith, R. & Takano , H., ANHRT:2017.7, slide No.: LGNA 33 ♀; 1 ♂, 2 ♀, 1416m, Changwena Falls , N. Swaka F. R., Copperbelt, S13°22’48”, E29°33’18”, 27– 28.X.2014, Light Trap, leg. Smith, Takano & Oram, ANHRT:2017.12, slide Nos: LGNA 95 ♂, LGNA 34 ♀, LGNA 37 ♀; 1 ♂, 1166 m, Ntumbachushi Falls, Ngona River , Luapula Prov., S09°51’12”, E28°56’40”, 12–13. V.2013, Light Trap, leg. Smith, Takano & Oram, ANHRT:2017.9, slide No.: LGNA 58 ♂; 1 ♂, same locality and collectors, but 3–4.XI.2014, slide No.: LGNA 17 ♂; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 1160m, Lake Kashiba, Mpongwe , S13°26’55”, E27°56’40” 25–26.X.2014, Light Trap, leg. Smith, Takano & Oram, ANHRT:2017.12, slide Nos: LGNA 101 ♀, LGNA 102 ♂; 2 ♀, 1320m, Lukangaba F. R., Mansa , S11°25’18”; E28°58’34”, 30–31.X.2014, Light Trap, leg. Smith, Takano & Oram, ANHRT:2017.12, slide Nos: LGNA 106 ♀, LGNA 108 ♀ ( ANHRT) .
Remark. The clasping apparatus of the holotype of M. foviferoides had not been mounted in a flattened position during the preparation of the genitalia and has therefore proved difficult to compare with other genitalia that have been prepared and mounted in the standard fashion. This is likely the reason why Hacker was unable to recognise the identical genitalia characters of M. foviferoides and M. longisigna Hacker, 2012 . Nevertheless, aside from the external similarity between the holotype of M. foviferoides and the specimens of M. longisigna illustrated in Hacker et al. (2012: 418), the main distinctive characters of the male genitalia are visible even on the poorly prepared genitalia slide of M. foviferoides , namely: the long, robust, almost straight, pointed uncus, the medially curved, apically dilated and broadly rounded valva, the relatively large and thick, medially incurved, apically broadly rounded harpe and the small, but conspicuous, thorn-like tooth of the carina. Based on a misinterpretation of the visible characters of this slide, Hacker suggested M. spermophaga to be a junior synonym of the M. foviferoides , despite the dissimilarities between the shape of the uncus, valva, harpe and aedeagus of the two species. Furthermore, the species was mistakenly described by Hacker 93 pages later in the monograph under the name M. politzari ( Hacker et al. 2012: 511) . As there is no noticeable difference between these three species, neither in habitus nor in genital morphology, M. longisigna and M. politzari are synonymised here with M. foviferoides . The rather polymorphic and abundant species is widely distributed throughout the open woodlands of Sub-Saharan Africa from Ivory Coast throughout Southern Ethiopia, reaching NW Zambia and Malawi in Southern Africa. Based on the extensive material of M. foviferoides housed in the ANHRT collection, the species can be considered as one of the most common and widely distributed Nolinae in Africa. The closest relative of M. foviferoides is M. obliquivittata Hacker, 2012 described from Madagascar.
Distribution. Zambia (the type locality of M. foviferoides was erroneously given as Zimbabwe in Hacker et al. (2012)), in addition, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi, Cameroon, D.R. Congo, Burundi, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso and Togo ( Hacker et al. 2012).
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
UV |
Departamento de Biologia de la Universidad del Valle |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Meganola foviferoides ( Poole, 1989 )
László, Gyula M. 2020 |
Meganola longisigna
Hacker 2012 |
Meganola politzari
Hacker 2012 |
Nola foviferoides
Poole 1989 |
Nola fovifera
Hampson 1911 |
Celama fovifera
Hampson 1903 |