Paropeas Pilsbry, 1906
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1208.116083 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0215503D-E8B4-4179-89F6-FB2CCC59F37E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13137136 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B7FF3714-175D-5C18-96E3-803512133513 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Paropeas Pilsbry, 1906 |
status |
|
Genus Paropeas Pilsbry, 1906
Prosopeas (Paropeas) Pilsbry, 1906: 14. Zilch 1959: 353.
Paropeas View in CoL — Naggs 1994: 175–191. Schileyko 1999: 508.
Type species.
Bulimus acutissimus Mousson, 1857 by original designation.
Diagnosis.
Shell slender and conical; spire high, turreted, and gradually attenuated; embryonic and subsequent whorls with irregularly dense, fine, or coarse radial striations. Aperture oblique, narrow or broadly ovate; columella concave; columellar margin expanded or not expanded. Penial simple, relatively long, slender, epiphallus short, flagellum absent, and penial sheath present; vagina ~ 1 / 2 of penis length and wider than penis.
Remarks.
Paropeas can be distinguished from Bacillum and Rishetia by its irregularly coarse radial striations throughout the shell, less concave or straighter columella, and narrowly tapering and pointed embryonic whorls (Table 2 View Table 2 ). While Bacillum has stronger and more evenly spaced radial striations, deeper concave and truncate columella, and cylindrically tapering and obtuse embryonic whorls. Likewise, Rishetia has a glossy and smoother shell, broader whorls, more concave columella, and rounded and wider aperture ( Pilsbry 1906; Gude 1914; Naggs 1994). In terms of genitalia, Rishetia is obviously distinct from Paropeas by having a tubular-shaped flagellum, while Paropeas has no flagellum ( Naggs 1994; Schileyko 1999).
Paropeas and Prosopeas are very similar in terms of shell form and sculpture, but Paropeas possess stronger and more compact striations on embryonic whorls ( Gude 1914; Naggs 1994). However, distinguishing between these two genera is still challenging, and precise identification requires further evidence, such as data on genitalia and molecular phylogeny.
This genus is mainly distributed in Southeast Asia. Seven recognised species are present, four are reported in Myanmar ( Gude 1914; Naggs 1994; Schileyko 1999; MolluscaBase 2023).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Paropeas Pilsbry, 1906
Man, Nem Sian, Ablett, Jonathan D., Lwin, Ngwe, Sutcharit, Chirasak & Panha, Somsak 2024 |
Paropeas
Schileyko AA 1999: 508 |
Naggs F 1994: 175 - 191 |
Prosopeas (Paropeas)
Zilch A 1959: 353 |
Pilsbry HA 1906: 14 |