Charissa (Pterygnophos)

Erlacher, Sven, Palma, Laura Marrero & Erlacher, Josepha, 2017, A systematic revision of Charissa, subgenus Pterygnophos Wehrli, 1951, with description of a new species (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), Zootaxa 4341 (3) : -

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4341.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FF11A5C7-2DAD-444C-8520-6098932AE208

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6042021

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B72D690B-BB7B-FFEA-FF64-7F655175FAFB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Charissa (Pterygnophos)
status

 

Key to Charissa (Pterygnophos) View in CoL species: female genitalia structures

(Abbreviations in brackets refer to Fig. 1b View FIGURE 1 )

The structure of the female genitalia is not basically different from some species of Charissa , subgenus Dysgnophos Wehrli, 1951 . Occasionally, it can be difficult to judge whether a specimen under examination is a female of Pterygnophos or of Dysgnophos . For this reason, using the provided key assumes that the female in question actually belongs to Pterygnophos.

1 Postvaginal plate (pvp) posteriorly almost not extending the antrum......................... C. (P.) beljaevi spec. nov.

- Postvaginal plate strongly extending the antrum............................................................ 2

2 Antrum comparatively short (1.57–1.83 mm) and broadly funnel-shaped (antrum width: 0.87–1.00 mm)... C. (P.) creperaria

- Antrum longer (1.77–2.91 mm) and slender (antrum width: <0.82 mm)......................................... 3

3 Antrum length> 2.2 mm and length of spined longitudinal folding (slf)> 1.3 mm ..................... C. (P.) agnitaria

- Antrum length 1.8–2.3 mm and length of spined longitudinal folding (slf) 1.1–1.3 mm ................................................................................................... C. (P.) agnitaria or C. (P.) ochrofasciata Shape and measured values of genitalia structures are too similar and widely overlapping, making a diagnosis ambiguous. Fur- ther information, for example origin of the specimen, should be taken into account and, if possible, comparative material should be used.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Geometridae

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Geometridae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF