Psamathe charpyi, Salazar-Vallejo, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2022v44a1 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F160F03E-EF81-41E0-8DC9-61BF440F75B7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5872790 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B716DD32-9B3D-AA20-9579-B2E6B32F02F3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Psamathe charpyi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Psamathe charpyi View in CoL n. sp.
( Fig. 1 View FIG )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9D66B0AF-12A5-40EA-81DB-01852D75F546
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. Clipperton Island • 1 specimen; Sta. 10; 10°17.31’N, 109°12.19’W; coral rubble, suction pump; 13 m; 17.I.2005; J.-M. Bouchard, L. Albenga & L. Dugrais leg; MNHN-IA-TYPE2040. GoogleMaps
DIAGNOSIS. — Psamathe with anterior eyes blackish, slightly larger than posterior ones; dorsal cirri longer than body width; ventral cirri reching tips of neurochaetal lobes; all neurochaetae compound, neurochaetal blades unidentate, 4-10× longer than wide.
ETYMOLOGY. — The specific epithet is derived after Dr Loïc Charpy, from the Centre d’Océanologie de Marseille, France, in recognition of his editorial coordination of the volume on Clipperton Island ( Charpy 2009). The specific epithet is a noun in the genitive case ( ICZN 1999, Art. 31.1.2).
DISTRIBUTION. — Only known from Clipperton Island, Eastern Pacific, in subtidal coral rubble (13 m depth).
DESCRIPTION
Body
Holotype (MNHN-IA-TYPE2040) anterior fragment; body colorless, subcylindrical, slightly wider posteriorly, 5.3 mm long, 1.4 mm wide, 22 chaetigers; all tentacular cirri lost, most dorsal cirri retained, tips lost ( Fig. 1A View FIG ). Right parapodia of chaetigers 10 and 14 removed to observe chaetae.
Anterior end
Prostomium slightly longer than wide ( Fig. 1B View FIG ), slightly wider anteriorly, lateral margins slightly curved. Lateral antennae lost, scars on anterior margin above palps. Palps directed ventrally, left palp lost, right palpostyle longer than palpophore, medially wider, tapered ( Fig. 1C View FIG ). Eyes large, blackish, positioned centrally on prostomium, anterior eyes slightly larger than posterior ones, directed anterolaterally. Nuchal organs following prostomial posterior corners. Tentacular belt partially visible dorsally. First two segments dorsally reduced, following two segments fused, distinct dorsally; anterior margin projected anteriorly, markedly wider than long, blunt. Eight pairs of tentacular cirri, all lost, cirrophores distinct.
Parapodia and chaetae
Parapodia (excluding chaetae) as long as body width, sesquiramous ( Fig. 1D View FIG ). Dorsal cirri with longer than wide articles, sometimes medially constricted.Prechaetal lobe subtriangular, blunt, as long as postchaetal round foliose lobe. Neurochaetae all compound heterogomph falcigers; upper and lower fascicle chaetae with shorter blades, longer in central fascicle chaetae; blades unidentate, 4-10× longer than wide, finely denticulate, basal denticles larger; guards reaching tip of denticle ( Fig. 1D View FIG , insets). Ventral cirri long, tapered, reaching tip of neurochaetal lobes.
Posterior region
Unknown.
REMARKS
Psamathe charpyi n. sp. resembles P. cirrata Keferstein, 1862 from the French Normandy coast because both species have ventral cirri reaching the tips of the neurochaetal lobes and all neurochaetae compound. They differ in the size of the eyes and of neurochaetal blades. In P.charpyi n. sp. eyes are almost of the same size, and the neurochaetal blades are 4-10× longer than wide, whereas in P. cirrata anterior eyes are 2-3× larger than posterior ones, and neurochaetal blades are 3-9× longer than wide. On the other hand, P. charpyi n. sp. differs from P. ancuda (Wesenberg-Lund, 1962) , described from Central Chile, in the shape and size of the ventral cirri, and in the size of the neurochaetal blades. In P. charpyi n. sp. ventral cirri are tapered, reaching the neurochaetal lobes tips, and neurochaetal blades are of different size, whereas in P. ancuda ventral cirri are blunt, not reaching the neurochaetal lobes, and all neurochaetae have blades of similar size.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |