Epeolus julliani Perez , 1884
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.94.96429 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DFD8F12-63C7-46B4-BD26-C498A83BBF6F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B708EB2A-8AD5-5A4D-9679-73838F78568D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Epeolus julliani Perez , 1884 |
status |
|
Fig. 9E, F View Figure 9
Epeolus julliani Pérez, 1884: 318-322, ♀ (type locality: Marseille, France; Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris).
Material examined.
Austria, Wien, (1 ♀), coll. F. Morawitz, Epeolus transitorius Eversm. [Morawitz det.] [ZISP]; Azerbaijan, Lenkoran, 28.VII.1930, (1 ♀), A. Shestakov [ZISP]; Georgia, Lagodehy, (1 ♀), coll. F. Morawitz [ZISP]; Iran, Shaku, Elbrus Mts., VI.1914, (1 ♀), Kirichenko [ZISP]; Tularud, 11.V.1916, (1 ♂), B. Ilyin [ZISP]; Kerman Prov., 8 km N of Bordsir, 200 m, 29°95'N, 56°58'E, 6.VI.2010, (1 ♂), Mi. Halada (OLBL); Moldova, Leovo, 25.VII.1913, (1 ♂), Chernavin [ZISP]; Kazakhstan, Kokshetau Mts. , 1. VII, 3.VIII.1958, (2 ♀), V. Rudolf [ZISP]; Aktobe, Berchogur [Birshoghyr], 26.VI.1910, (7 ♀, 3 ♂), L. Bubyr [ZISP]; Russia, Dagestan Rep., 20 km W of Makhachkala, Sarykum , 23-24.V.2019, (1 ♂), MP, VL [FSCV]; Crimea, Mukhalatka, VII.1902, (1 ♀), N. Kuznetzov [ZISP]; Sevastopol, 28.VII.1916, (1 ♀), Pliginski [ZISP]; idem, 7.VII.2015, (1 ♀), V. Zhidkov [ZISP]; Tarkhankut, Atlesh, 29.VII.2008, (1 ♂), AF [ZISP]; Tarkhankut, Bolshoy Kastel, 25.VII.2015, (7 ♀), AF [ZISP]; idem, on Jurinea stoechadifolia, 8.VIII.2015, (1 ♀), V. Zhidkov [ZISP]; idem, 9.VIII.2020, (2 ♀), S. Ivanov [ZISP]; Tarkhankut, Kipchak, 16.IV.2016, (3 ♀, 1 ♂), V. Zhidkov [ZISP]; Tarkhankut, Dzhangul, 26.VII.2017, (3 ♀), AF [ZISP]; Feodossia, Karadag, 15.VI.2015, (1 ♀), AF [ZISP]; Lukull Cape, 8.VII.2015, (3 ♀), AF [ZISP]; near Sudak, 27.V.2016, (1 ♂), AF [ZISP]; Krasnodar Terr., Anapa, Bolshoy Utrish, 2.VII.2018, (1 ♀), AF [ZISP]; Orenburg Prov. , Orenburg, (1 ♂), coll. F. Morawitz, Epeolus transitorius Eversm. [Morawitz det.] [ZISP]; SPAIN, Andalusia, 26.VI. (1 ♀, 1 ♂) [ZISP]; Ukraine, Akkerman[=Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi], (1 ♂), 21.VIII.1921, Petrovich [ZISP] .
Remarks.
The main differences between Epeolus julliani and E. transitorius are outlined by Le Divelec 2021, who removed the former from synonymy with the latter. Here, we describe the structure of the male genitalia (Table 1 View Table 1 ).
The integument coloration and variability are closest to E. transitorius (see below). Unlike E. transitorius , all studied female specimens of E. julliani have a sparsely pubescent or almost glabrous clypeus (vs on that is often obscured by dense tomentum), and the lower mesepisternum is always pubescent (vs often glabrous).
Distribution.
North Africa, Middle East, Europe, Caucasus, Russia (south of European part, south Ural), *Kazakhstan, Iran ( Bischoff 1930; Le Divelec 2021; current data).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Epeolus julliani Perez , 1884
Astafurova, Yulia V. & Proshchalykin, Maxim Yu. 2022 |
Epeolus julliani
Perez 1884 |