Catapaguroides longior Komai, Yamada & Shirakawa, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4560.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:120E7D55-C2C4-4A8C-A124-8A69A0B5DB21 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3510758 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B60387DA-D36D-FF8C-FF49-388AFC35F973 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Catapaguroides longior Komai, Yamada & Shirakawa, 2010 |
status |
|
Catapaguroides longior Komai, Yamada & Shirakawa, 2010 View in CoL
( Figs. 1F, G View FIGURE 1 , 4 View FIGURE 4 E–J)
Catapaguroides longior Komai, Yamada & Shirakawa, 2010: 33 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , figs. 1–4, 5A (type locality: Okinawa Island, Ryukyu Islands).
Material examined. Ie Island, unnamed submarine cave: main tube, near bifurcation of tube, 8 September 2016, 1 male (sl 2.1 mm), RUMF-ZC-6027 ( IE 60 ); main tube, 9 September 2016, 2 males (sl 1.4, 2.1 mm), RUMF-ZC- 6028 ( IE 65 ). Okinawa Island , Hedo Dome cave: silty room, 22 May 2017, 1 female (sl 1.2 mm), RUMF-ZC- 6029 ( HD 2017-107); same data as RUMF-ZC-6029, 1 male (sl 1.4 mm), RUMF-ZC-6030 ( HD 2017-141).
Distribution. Ryukyu Islands (Ie Island and Okinawa Island) in southwestern Japan; 15–30 m (Komai et al. 2010; present study).
Habitat. Coral reefs; inside of a submarine cave about 10 m from the entrance (Komai et al. 2010).
Remarks. Catapaguroides longior was described by Komai et al. (2010) based only on the male holotype. The present material includes a first female of the species (sl 1.2 mm, RUMF-ZC-6029, HD2017-107; Fig. 1G View FIGURE 1 ).
The holotype has a small but distinct dorsomedian spine on the carpus of the right cheliped (cf. Komai et al. 2010: fig. 2 A, D). In the present material, the spine is prominent only in a female and it is minute or absent in other male specimens ( Fig. 4H, J View FIGURE 4 ). Additionally, the ventrolateral distal angle of the carpus of the right cheliped is unarmed in the holotype, whereas it has a minute to small spine in the present material ( Fig. 4H, J View FIGURE 4 ).
The fresh coloration superficially resembles between C. foresti and C. longior ( Fig. 1D, F, G View FIGURE 1 ), but some morphological characters easily distinguish the two species. The ocular peduncles are comparatively longer and more slender in C. foresti than C. longior , and the corneas are conical in C. foresti rather than rounded in C. longior ( Fig. 4A, B, E, F View FIGURE 4 ). In the right cheliped, the distomesial angle of the palm and the proximomesial margin of the dactylus have a small spine respectively in C. foresti , instead of being unarmed in C. longior , and the fixed finger is stouter in C. foresti than C. longior , particularly in males ( Fig. 4C, D, G, I View FIGURE 4 ). The male sexual tube on the coxa of the right fifth pereopod is also much stouter and shorter in C. foresti than C. longior . (cf. McLaughlin 2002b: fig. 1H; Osawa & Takeda 2004: fig. 9F, as C. kasei ; Komai et al. 2010: fig. 1I).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Catapaguroides longior Komai, Yamada & Shirakawa, 2010
Osawa, Masayuki & Fujita, Yoshihisa 2019 |