Duplexissus, Wang & Zhang & Bourgoin, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4706.2.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B5D50B0-4A39-4351-9BE9-E816A1F4B5A2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B45787A8-122D-FF93-FF16-4409FCD4FD43 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Duplexissus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Duplexissus View in CoL gen. nov.
Type species: Duplexissus punctatulus sp. n., here designated.
Diagnosis. This new genus is very similar to Eusarima Yang, 1994 in general appearances, but differs by: phallic complex with two pairs of long processes directed to cephalad, one of it dentated ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–22 ), while phallic complex with a pair of long process directed to cephalad and a pair of relatively short process without teeth directed to caudal in Eusarima ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 45H).
This new genus also resembles to Sinesarima Yang, 1994 , but differs by: 1) Forewing with ScP+RA extremely long ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–17 ), but ScP+RA very short in Sinesarima ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 40C); 2) Frons with median carina and sublateral carinae all long, from the apex extending to near base ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ), but much shorter in Sinesarima , median carina extending less than middle, sublateral carinae only present in apical 1/4 ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 40B).
This new genus is also similar to Yangissus Chen, Zhang & Chang, 2014 , but differs by: 1) ScP+RA on forewing extremely long, reaching about apical 1/6 ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 12–17 ), but much shorter in Yangissus , only reaching to middle of forewing ( Chen et al., 2014, fig. 2-82F); 2) Vertex with apical margin angularly convex ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ), but roundly convex in Yangissus ( Chen et al., 2014, fig. 2-82C); 3) Posterior margin of pygofer smooth, without posterior spine ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–22 ), but with an obvious and sharp posterior spine near the apex on posterior margin ( Chen et al., 2014, fig. 2- 82I).
Etymology. The name refers to the phallic complex with two pairs of processes in the male genitalia. The gen- der is masculine.
Description. Head with compound eyes slightly wider than pronotum ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Compound eyes axis in dorsal view converging ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Vertex rectangular, broader than long, margins elevated, anterior margin slightly angularly convex, posterior margin anterior angularly concave at middle, median carina weakly present ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ) or absent on disc. Frons in widest part a little wider than long in midline, broaden below level of antennae, the lateral angles rounded ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ); all margins elevated, dorsal margin slightly concave at middle, lateral margins gradually broadening from apex to the level below the antennae; median carina present from apex extending to near base with apical half elevated and basal part unconspicuous ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ), sublateral carinae weakly present from apex extending to near base ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Frons with apical and lateral areas distributed with some large tubercles ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Frontoclypeal suture very slightly convex, almost straight ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Clypeus smooth ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Rostrum reaching hind coxae, the apical segment slightly shorter than subapical segment. Gena in lateral view oblique ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Antenna with scape extremely short, pedicel rounded ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Pronotum triangular, a little longer than vertex, margins elevated, anterior margin angularly protruded, posterior margin straight, with a small incision on each side of midline, median carina weakly present, disc with few small tubercles on each side of lateral area ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Mesonotum longer than pronotum in midline, anterior margin straight, tricarinated on the disc ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Forewings obviously longer than broad, longitudinally elevated; costal area narrow, ScP+RA and RP in a common stem at base, ScP+RA and RP all extremely long, respectively reaching to the apical 1/6 and the outer margin of forewing ( Figs 13, 16 View FIGURES 12–17 ); MP forking at the middle into a forked MP1+2 and a forked or unforked MP3+4; CuA first forking almost in the same level with MP ( Figs 13, 16 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Clavus closed, Pcu and A1 fused at middle of clavus ( Figs 12, 16 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Hind wings developed, of Sarimini type with 3 well-developed lobes, Pcu-A1 lobe as wide as ScP-R-MP-Cu lobe, Pcu and A1 anastomosing on a long distance, Pcu unbranched, A2 lobe developed, slightly wider than Pcu-A1 lobe, A2 vein unbranched ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 12–17 ). Metatibia with two lateral spines on apical half.
Male genitalia. Anal tube in lateral view long and broad ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–22 ). Pygofer in lateral view rectangular, posterior margin slightly convex ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–22 ). Gonostylus trapezoid in lateral view, dorsal margin convex and elevated at apical 1/3, ventral margin with caudo-ventral angle deeply convex, posterior margin sinuate ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–22 ). Capitulum of gonostylus short and broad, antero-lateral margin with a process near base ( Figs 18, 20 View FIGURES 18–22 ). Periandrium U-shaped, divided into dorsal, lateral and ventral lobes in the apical part, dorsal lobe with a pair of dentated processes originated from apical 1/4 of each side ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–22 ). Aedeagus with pair of processes originated from apical 1/4 directed to cephalad in lateral view ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–22 ).
Distribution. China (Yunnan province).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.